Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Back to Project

All Documents

Displaying 685 Document(s)
Letters from Northern Project Management Office to Yellowknives Dene and North Slave Metis Alliance regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Report of EA and Reasons for Decision.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Minister's decision and final measures
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 689
This is a letter from the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada to the Review Board Chairperson regarding the decision and final measures.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Minister's decision and final measures
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 688
This is the Minister of AANDC's response to Alternatives North letter of April 28, 2014 regarding inspections at Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 687
This is a letter from Alternaitves North to the Minister of AANDC regarding inspections at Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 686
This joint letter from the YKDFN, the City of Yellowknives and Alternatives North asks responsible ministers to accept the Giant Report of EA measures with proposed modifications, and conclude the EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 685
This is the Review Board's response to the Responsible Ministers' suggested modifications to certain measures from the Report of EA. It includes the Board's recommended revisions.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 684
These are Alternatives North's comments on the ministers' suggested modifications to measures from the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 683
These are the NSMA's comments on the ministers' suggested modifications to measures from the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 682
These are the YKDFN's comments on the ministers' suggested modifications to measures from the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 681
These are the City of Yellowknife's comments on the ministers' suggested modifications to measures from the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 680
These are the developer's comments on the ministers' suggested modifications to measures from the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 679
This letter provides information on the Jan. 20th 2014 working meeting, which is part of the consult-to-modify process for the Giant EA. It includes an agenda.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 678
This letter describes the consult-to-modify process to consider modifications to certain measures from the Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 677
This is a letter from NPMO to the Tlicho Government requesting comments on proposed modifications to the Review Board's measures from the Giant Report of EA
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 676
This is a letter from NPMO to the NSMA requesting comments on proposed modifications to the Review Board's measures from the Giant Report of EA
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 675
This is a letter from NPMO to the YKDFN requesting comments on proposed modifications to the Review Board's measures from the Giant Report of EA
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 674
This is a letter from the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board initiating consultation to proposed modification of 9 measures.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Minister's decision and final measures
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 673
This is the YKDFN's response to the developer's comments about the Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 672
This is the City of Yellowknife's response to the developer's comments about the Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 671
This is the City of Yellowknife's response to the developer's comments about the Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 670
This is Alternatives North's response to the developer's comments about the Report of EA. Includes Nov. 14 working group meeting summary, draft Environmental Agreement, media coverage and chronology.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 669
This is the reply from AANDC to MP Dennis Bevington's letter of Oct. 7 2013 regarding the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 668
This document contains three excerpts from the hansard of the Legislative assembly regarding questions about the Giant EA. This was submitted to the public registry by MLA Bob Bromley.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 667
This Note to File is a disclaimer regarding recent materials posted to the Public Registry.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 666
This is MLA Bob Bromley's Member's Statement of Nov. 4, 2013 regarding the Giant Team response to the environmental assessment. It was submitted by Bob Bromley's office.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 665
This is a letter from CanNor on behalf of Responsible Ministers. It invites the Tlicho Government to submit its comments on the developer's analysis of the environmental assessment by Nov. 29, 2013.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 664
This is a letter from CanNor on behalf of Responsible Ministers. It invites the NSMA to submit its comments on the developer's analysis of the environmental assessment by Nov. 29, 2013.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 663
This is a letter from CanNor on behalf of Responsible Ministers. It invites the YKDFN to submit its comments on the developer's analysis of the environmental assessment by Nov. 29, 2013.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 662
This letter from AANDC on behalf of Responsible Ministers encourages parties to submit their responses to the environmental assessment by Nov. 29 2013.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 661
This is a letter and detailed attachment describing the Giant Team's review and comments on the Report of EA, along with a covering letter from NPMO.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 660
This e-mail from Alternatives North includes an excerpt of the hearing transcript discussion the role of the Giant Team in the review of the Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 659
This document, submitted by Alternatives North, is a motion and related transcript of the NWT Legislative Assembly regarding the Giant Mine Report of EA on October 21, 2013.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 658
This is a letter from Member of Parliament Dennis Bevington to federal ministers regarding the Giant Mine Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 657
This letter from AANDC Minister Valcourt acknowledges the August 7th 2013 letter from MLAs W. Bisaro, B. Bromley and R. Hawkins regarding the Giant Report of Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 656
This is a letter from the City of Yellowknife to Responsible Ministers regarding the Giant Report of Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 655
This is a letter about the Giant Mine Report of Environmental Assessment from the YKDFN to federal and territorial ministers.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 654
This letter from the North Slave Metis Alliance provides comments on the Giant Report of EA. It was sent to the NPMO.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 653
This letter from the Yellowknives Dene provides comments on the Giant Report of EA. It was sent to the NPMO.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 652
Letter from 3 Members of the NWT Legislative Assembly to responsible Ministers regarding the Giant Remediation Project Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 651
These City of Yellowknife Council Meeting minutes of July 8 2013 includes a motion that was passed regarding the Giant Report of Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 650
This is a Weledeh / Dogrib translation of the decision, executive summary, conclusions, measures and suggestions of the Giant Report of Environmental Assessment, translated at the request of YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Report of Environmental Assessment/Impact Review
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 649
Letters from Northern Projects Management Office to Aboriginal organizations
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 648
This is the Review Board's Report of Environmental Assessment for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Report of Environmental Assessment/Impact Review
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 647
This is a news release regarding the Giant Report of EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Report of Environmental Assessment/Impact Review
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 646
This is a media advisory indicating that the Board will release its Report of EA on the proposed Giant Mine Remediation Project on June 20th, 2013 at 9:30 am.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Report of Environmental Assessment/Impact Review
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 645
This is one of two reports submitted in response to part three of the Review Board's February 2013 information request.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 644
This is one of two reports submitted in response to part three of the Review Board's February 2013 information request.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 643
This is a table provided by AANDC containing additional information on engineered wetlands for water treatment at Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 642
This is additional information on water treatment alternatives provided by AANDC in response to questions from YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 641
This is an e-mail from DFO regarding the developer's 2013 IR responses.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 640
This is a letter from Alternatives North containing their comments on the developers March 2013 IR responses to the Review Board's February 2013 Information Request on the proposed diffuser.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 639
This is a report by AECOM and SENES prepared in response to the Review Board's February 2013 information request regarding water treatment alternatives.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 638
This is the developer's response to the Review Board's March 2013 information request regarding water treatment and release alternatives.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 637
This is one of four attachments to the letter of March 8, 2013 from AANDC to the MVLWB regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 636
This is one of four attachments to the letter of March 8, 2013 from AANDC to the MVLWB regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 635
This is one of four attachments to the letter of March 8, 2013 from AANDC to the MVLWB regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 634
This is one of four attachments to the letter of March 8, 2013 from AANDC to the MVLWB regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 633
This letter of March 8, 2013 from AANDC to the MVLWB describes emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 632
This letter informs parties of the deadline for comments on the developer's March 2013 IR responses.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 631
This is a letter from the Review Board to the MVLWB regarding the EA scope and the emergency work proposed at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 630
Letter from AANDC to Review Board re: emergency work at Giant Mine site
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 629
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 628
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 627
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 626
Arsenic Procedures (236.11 KB)
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 625
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 624
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 623
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 622
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 621
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 620
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 619
This is one of a series of documents from AANDC regarding emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization at the Giant mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 618
This letter from the Review Board to the developer discusses s.119 emergency work on the roaster and underground stabilization, and the scope of the environemental assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 617
This letter from the Review Board to the developer grants one additoional week for the current Information Request response.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 616
This is a request from the developer for a one-week extension to the Board's response deadline for the current Information Request
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 615
This is an information request to the developer regarding the proposed diffuser. It includes a covering letter to parties stating that the Board is re-opening the record for this subject only.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 614
YKDFN IR 25 Response (470.33 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 613
YKDFN IR 24 Response (487.85 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 612
These are the closing comments from the developer.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 611
The following document contains Environment Canada's final comments regarding the Review Board's environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Hearing follow-up
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 610
This is a Note to File regarding the participation of Board member John Curran in this environmental assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 609
This is the closing statement from DFO.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 608
There are the closing comments from Alternatives North
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 607
There are the closing comments from the NSMA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 606
There are the closing comments from the YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 605
This is a letter from Mike Mitchell, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 604
This is the Sept. 11 2012 hearing presentation by Bob Bromley, MLA for Weledeh.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 603
This is the text of the story by Margret Atwood read in the presentation by Terry Pamplin at the Giant hearing on Tuesday Sept. 11, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 602
This is a 1968 Report on the Town of Yellowknife Water Supply Line by DIAND. It was submitted by City of Yellowknife in response to hearing discussions (per Sept. 13 2012 hearing transcript pages 74-75)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 601
This is a memo from Golder Associates prepared for the developer comparing diffusers and mixing zones. It is hearing Exhibit 10.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 600
This is a discussion paper titled "Considerations Regardign the Establishmnet of an Environmental Monitoring Committee for the Giant Mine Remediation Project". It is Exhibit 11 in the Giant hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 599
This is Undertaking # 4 from the developer. It describes the steps and schedule for further design of parts of the project (per hearing day 5 transcript, p170-177).
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 598
This is an article regarding debate on monitoring in perpetuity for a mine in Alaska. It was submitted for the regiistry by Leslie Wakelyn, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 597
This is Undertaking #3 from the developer, regarding best available practical technology for the water treatment plant (per day 5 transcript, pages 153-155)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 596
This the developer's cover letter and undertaking #1 from the hearing..
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 595
This the developer's response to Alternatives North's Round 2 IR #10. It includes a summary report by Golder Associates describing the preliminary diffuser design. This is part of hearing Exhibit 9.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 594
This is the NWT Water Board's 1992 Guidelines for the Discharge of Treated Municipal Wastewater in the NWT. It is part of hearing exhibit 9.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 593
This is the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board's Water anf Effluent Quality Management Policy. It is one of three parts of hearing Exhibit 9.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 592
This is Undertaking #2 from the developer. It includes three documents from Health Canada. (per hearing day 2 transcript, pages 220-233). Parts of this document are also identified as hearing Exhibit 8.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 591
This is the Northern Affairs Organziation Contaminated Sites Program Performance Report 2010-2011. It was submitted by the developer as is Exhibit 4 in the Giant hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 590
This is the Northern Affairs Organziation Contaminated Sites Program Performance Report 2009-2010. It was submitted by the developer as is Exhibit 3 in the Giant hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 589
This is the Northern Affairs Organziation Contaminated Sites Program Performance Report 2008-2009. It was submitted by the developer as is Exhibit 2 in the Giant hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 588
This is the Northern Affairs Organziation Contaminated Sites Program Performance Report 2007-2008. It was submitted by the developer as is Exhibit 1 in the Giant hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 587
This document describes Alternatives North's background and membership. It was submitted in response to a Board request at the hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 586
This is a letter from Leslie Wakelyn, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 585
This is a letter from Erin Suliak, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 584
This is a letter from Wendy Lahey, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 583
This is a letter from Erica Janes, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 582
This is a letter from Carol Lafontaine, member of the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 581
This is a letter submitted by Caroline Lafontaine describing concerns with the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 580
Transcript of Day 5, Sept 14, 2012, of the Giatn Mine public hearing held in Yellowknife at the Tree of Peace
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 579
Transcript of Day 4, September 13, 2012, of the Giant Mine public hearing held in Yellowknife at the Tree of Peace.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 578
Transcript of Day 3, September 12, 2012, of the Public Hearing for the Giant Mine EA, held in Yellowknife at the Tree of Peace.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 577
This document contains transcripts from the public hearing held September 11, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 576
This document contains transcripts from the public hearing held September 10, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 575
This document, labelled Exhibit 5,was submitted by Alternatives North to the Review Board during the September 12, 2012 public hearings and describes the background on Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 574
This is a letter dated September 25, 1973 from Yellowknives Dene First Nation to Minister J. Chretien, DIIAND re: arsenic contaminated water from Giant Mine in Yellowknife Bay submitted to the Board at community hearing in Dettah Sept 12, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 573
This is a letter from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation to Jane Stewart, Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development re: closure and reclamation of the Giant Mine submitted to the Review Board at the Dettah Community Hearing Sept 12, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 572
A letter from the public, Mr. Robert Wilson, expressing concerns with the Giant Mine Remediation Project, specifically regarding water quality and public safety.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 571
Letter from the public, Mr. Craig Yeo, outlining concerns with the proposed Giant Mine Remediation Project, specifically public safety, the release of contaminated water into Yellowknife Bay, funding for perpetual care, and independent oversight.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 570
This is an update on the freeze optimization study as of August 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 569
This is the hearing schedule and the shuttle schedule.The shuttle goes between Dettah and Yellowknife everyday of the hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 568
These are responses from Environment Canada to Alternatives North's questions of Aug. 3 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 567
This letter from the developer described the status of discussions on an arms-length oversight comittee for the Giant project
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 566
This is the developer's hearing presentation on oversight (day 5)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 565
This is the developer's hearing presentation on perpetual care (day 4)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 564
This is the developer's hearing presentation on surface (day 3)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 563
This is the developer's hearing presentation on water (day 2)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 562
This is the developer's freeze and underground hearing presentation (Day 1)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 561
This is the developer's project overview hearing presentation (Day 1)
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 560
This is a Note to File and e-mail regarding YKDFN hearing presentations.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 559
This is an e-mial and memo from BacTech Environmental responding to the SRK memo of Aug. 14, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 558
This file contains four hearing presentations by the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 557
This correspondence from the Review Board specifies that the developer has until 5:00 pm on Friday August 31st, 2012 to submit its hearing presentations.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 556
This document is a brochure sponsored by Alternatives North, the City of Yellowknife and Ecology North for the upcoming Public Hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 555
The attached file contains a collection of media documents regarding the Giant Mine site and Remediation Project - submitted by Alternatives North
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 554
Analysis and results of the summer 2009 air quality monitoring program to establish a baseline for fugitive emissions pertaining to the tailings areas and other sources at the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 553
Analysis and results of the summer 2008 air quality monitoring program to establish a baseline for fugitive emissions pertaining to the tailings areas and other sources at the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 552
Analysis and results of the 2006 summer air quality monitoring program to establish baseline fugitive emissions from the tailings areas and other disturbed areas at the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 551
Analysis and results of the 2005 summer air quality monitoring program to establish a baseline for fugitive emissions from the tailings areas and other disturbed areas at the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 550
This is an e-mail from the YKDFN stating its intent to present at the Public Hearing on Monday, September 10, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 549
Record of Giant Mine Environmental Assessment Delays as compiled by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 548
Follow-up e-mail from Alternatives North regarding the receipt of participant frunding for the Giant Mine Remediation Project environmental assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 547
A collection of presentations by DFO for the GMRP Public Hearings. Includes: 1. Flow and Diffuser; 2. Baker and Tailings; and 3. Monitoring.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 546
A collection of presentations by EC for the GMRP Public Hearings. Includes 1. Cover Letter; 2. Introduction Presentation; 3. Water Effluent Presentation; and 3. Air Quality, WIldlife, Tailings and Baker Creek Presentation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 545
The following document contains CVs for experts presenting on behalf of Alternatives North at the Giant Mine Public Hearing: Dr. Natashe Affolder, Duncan Kenyon, John Kuyek, Karen LeGresley Hamre, and Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 544
A collection of presentations by AN experts for the GMRP Public Hearings. Includes 1. Affolder - Independent Oversight; 2. Kenyon - Perpetual Care Funding; 3. Kuyek - Perpetual Care; and 4. LeGresley Hamre - Designation Options.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 543
A collection of presentations by AN for the GMRP Public Hearings. Includes 1. Opening Remarks; 2. Frozen Block and Underground; 3. Water Treatment and Mgmt; 4. Surface Remediation; 5. Perpetual Care; and 6. Monititoring and Independent Oversight
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 542
Alternatives North cover letter for the Giant Mine Remediation Project environmental assessment public hearing. Includes questions about participant funding and submission of an update on the Freeze Optimization Study.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 541
This document is the City of Yellowknife's submission for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 540
"Industry Day" presentation made by PWGSC on July 30, 2012. The presentation shows the show the most recent publicly available information on the schedule for work at the site and details including roaster demolition.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 539
"Industry Day" presentation made by PWGSC on July 30, 2012. The presentation shows the most recent publicly available information on the procurement process, objectives, and contracts.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 538
Alternatives North follow-up questions regarding the Giant Mine 2010 Air Quality Monitoring Baseline Report.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 537
This report provides details of baseline monitoring programs, the results and discussion of the findings, comparisons between 2010 data and data from the previous monitoring programs, as well as conclusions and recommendations.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 536
This document represents a start in outlining the complex social and economic aspects of the gold mining industry in the Yellowknife area.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 535
Alternatives North questions on AANDC-GNWT organizational chart for the Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 534
AANDC and the Land and Water Boards have developed these guidelines in support of the vision of an efficient and effective regulatory process.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 533
Draft terms and conditions that may become part of a land use permit for the Giant Mine Geotechnical Program.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 532
This MVLWB letter notifies parties that a new land use permit application for the Giant Mine Geotechnical Program is available for review and comment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 531
This memo provides an assessment of BacTech Environmental Corp.'s (BacTech) Bacterial Oxidation (BACOX) technology for remediating the Giant mine (Giant) tailings, located on the north side of Yellowknife, NWT.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 530
Alternatives North e-mail providing additional points for consideration in relation to their letter on Redactions to the Site Stabilization Plan.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 529
Alternatives North letter indicating concerns with unilaterally decided redactions made by AANDC to the Site Stabilization Plan prior to submission to the public registry.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 528
This is the revised agenda for the Giant EA hearings from Sept. 10-14 2012 in Yellowknife and Dettah NT.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 527
Letter advising parties to direct any Giant EA correspondence to EAO Shannon Hayden until Aug. 28 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 526
This document provides knowledge of the historical environmental and health impacts of Giant Mine, and a thorough analysis of the mine's impact on the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 525
Cover letter introducing the "Giant Mine: Historical Summary" report submitted by researchers from Memorial University.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 524
This e-mail communication provides some clarification on YKDFN recommendations.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 523
This report has been submitted by Alternatives North to support the initiation of and highlight the effectiveness of independent monitoring agencies in an international context.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 522
This report has been submitted by Alternatives North to support the initiation of and highlight the effectiveness of independent monitoring agencies in a local context.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 521
This report has been submitted by Alternatives North to support the initiation of and highlight the effectiveness of independent monitoring agencies in a local context.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 520
This e-mail from Alternatives North provides links and attachments (also provided on the Registry) supporting the effectiveness of independent monitoring agencies locally and internationally.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 519
Request from Alternatives North to the Giant Mine Project team for submission of updated Field Optimization Study findings
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 518
Plan language summary of the NSMA technical report.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 517
Summary of the Giant Mine Remediation Project team's current thinking with respect to long-term stewardship of the waste legacy at Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 516
This document sets out the intended procurement strategy of the Government of Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories to achieve both the objectives of site remediation while fostering northern economic development opportunities.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 515
This Golder Report provides a summary of findings on a fish monitoring program carried out following the May 2011 overflow event.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 514
This document prvides fish use habitat maps for Reaches 0 through 6 of Baker Creek
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 513
These documents provide an update of the Baker Creek Fish and Fish Habitat Project and a summary of the seasonal fish use at Baker Creek.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 512
This document presents the findings of the 2009 fish monitoring program on Baker Creek, and constitutes the third of three annual reports.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 511
This document provides a summary and discussion of the fish monitoring plan methods and results following construction at Reach 4 of Baker Creek in 2006
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 510
This plan aims to address the dangers at the Giant Mine site in response to information regarding on-site risks and the extended timelines of the regulatory process.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 509
This meeting is intended to be both an update on the activities of the Giant Mine Remediation Project Team on the EMS and a follow-up to the previous meeting of April 25 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 508
This meeting was a follow-up to the 5 March 2012 EMS Update with the Parties, with the purpose of providing another informal update on the recent and current activities of the GMRP Team on the EMS and seek further feedback from interested parties.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 507
The purpose of this meeting was to provide an informal update on the current activities of the GMRP team on the Environmental Management System (EMS) and seek feedback from interested parties.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 506
Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Management Working Group
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 505
GMRP Definitions (78.46 KB)
Updated list of Giant Mine Project definitions
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 504
Environmental Management System (EMS) progress report and work plan
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 503
This memo provides an assessment of the potential risk to human health of a member of the public that could walk or run along the Ingraham Trail during Giant Mine Remediation Project (GMRP) activities.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 502
This report documents the results of monitoring of four tailings cover test plots during the 2010 season.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 501
Report identifying risk assessments for Phase 2 alternatives for perpetual care of the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 500
Outlines AANDC requirements for the registration, organization, and preservation of information.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 499
Table identifying the Giant Mine Project Team structure.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 498
AECOM report summarizing the results of sludge testing and the bench scale testing program including a discussion on the implications of the results and a brief discussion on the results of the equipment manufacturer's independent testing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 497
This is a Golder memo presenting baseline data for snow depth, ice thickness and water quality for hydrodynamic modelling of Yellowknife Bay.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 496
The Giant Mine Project Team is proceeding with two lines of investigation in support of engineering and design of the project's frozen block method for managing the underground arsenic dust.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 495
Memo describing the process for determining the criteria for success of ground freezing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 494
Cover letter outlining the items submitted by the Giant Team in response to recommendations from the Pre-Technical Report Workshop and correspondence with the Review Board - also filed under 'Developer's Assessment Report"
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 493
Giant Mine Project response to Parties' technical report recommendations - table format
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 492
This letter from the Review Board to parties announces the closure of the public record after August 31st 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 491
This letter describes the Review Board's approach to considering the late and partial submission of the North Slave Metis Alliance's technical report.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 490
Updated and revised commitments table for the Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 489
Cover letter outlining the items submitted by the Giant Team in response to recommendations from the Pre-Technical Report Workshop and correspondence with the Review Board - (also filed under 'Other public registry materials"
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 488
Questions submitted by Alternatives North for the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan and Treasury Board Secretariats on Perpetual Care in preparation for the Public Hearing
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 487
This is a letter from Yellowknife resident Lois Little regarding concerns and recommendations regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 486
This is the draft agenda for the Giant EA hearings. It includes a covering letter with additonal hearing instructions and upcoming deadlines.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 485
This is e-mail correspondence from Alternatives North regarding an updated table of comittments and the developer's responses to technical reports.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 484
This e-mail from Alternatives North describes expected documents, issues and timing requirements for the hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 483
This is Alternatives North's technical report
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 482
Pre-hearing conference: The call in number is 1-888-619-1583. The participant code is 748 631 0459.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 481
This letter from the Review Board describes the upcoming pre-hearing conference. It includes an agenda.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 480
This file contains several articles and reports on the ethnoigenesis of the Metis, a UN declartion of indigenous rights, arsenic in sedmiments, Francois Beaulieu, and other subjects submitted by the NSMA in support of its upcoming technical report.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 479
This is a report of a workshop (similar to a Review Board technical session) held by the Giant team prior to technical report preperation. It was held on June 27th and 28th 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 478
This is the technical report submitted by Environment Canada.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 477
This is the technical report from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 476
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 475
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 474
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 473
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 472
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 471
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 470
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 469
The following document was a presentation by the Giant Mine Remediation Team at a June 2012 workshop for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 468
The following document is Fisheries and Oceans Canada's technical report submission for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 467
The following document is a May 2005 tabular summary of crown pillar failure risk-ranking.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 466
The following document is a memo from SRK Consulting to the Giant Mine Remediation Project proponent regarding crown pillar stability on the Giant Mine site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 465
The following document is an independent risk assessment of Giant Mine components related to arsenic trioxide migration for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 464
The following document is a Golder assessment on the stability of Stope 2-01 Complex Crown Pillar in relation to the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 463
The following document is a stability assessment by Golder on Crown Pillar B2-08 in relation to the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 462
The following document is a memo from Golder for the Giant Mine Remediation Project proponent regarding proposed mitigation for high risk underground workings in relation to the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 461
The following document is a memo from Golder for the Giant Mine Remediation Project proponent regarding stope stability and surface access.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 460
The following document is a memo from AECOM for the Giant Mine Remediation Project proponent regarding the structural integrity of the Giant-site roaster complex and other buildings.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 459
Resume of K.A. Enns (44.95 KB)
This is the CV of Katherine A. Enns, an ecotoxicologist the Board is considering engaging as a part of its experts group for the Giant Mine EA. Parties wishing to comment should do so before July 16, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 458
This letter reminds parties of upcoming dates and advises them of a change of contact for the week week of July 10th to 13th 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 457
This e-mail from Alternatives North asks the Giant team for plans regarding the demolition of the roaster complex, legal jsutification, and a related comittment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 456
This is the consolidated version of the "French Radioactive Materials and Waste Planning Act of 28 June 2006" by ANDRA, submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 455
This is an ANDRA report, submitted by Alternatives North, titled Disposal Faciltiies: Preserving a Collecitve Memory for Future Generations.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 454
This is the French law titled THE 2006 PROGRAMME ACT ON THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND WASTES. Submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 453
This is a report titled Making Nuclear Waste Governable: Deep Undergroung Disposal and the Challenge of Reversability, by ANDRA, the nuclear waste management authority of France.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 452
This e-mail from Alternatives North describes financing of perpetual care nuclear waste sites in France. [ It accompanies four reports posted seperately].
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 451
This is the Material Safety Data Sheet for refrigerant R-507, the halocarbon spilled on the Giant Mine site on June 29th, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 450
This is a spill report by Deton'Cho Nuna Joint Venutre to the NWT SPill Line about a halocarbon spill at the Freeze Optimization Study at Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 449
This e-mail discusses the recent halocarbon spill at the Giant Mine site. [Two accompanying documents are posted seperately].
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 448
This e-mail from Alternatives North asks the Giant team about meeting summaries and information about oversight committee meetings.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 447
This report, by the UK Nuclear Decomissioning Authority, describes the environmental safety case for geological disposal of nuclear waste. It was submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 446
This report, by the UK Nuclear Decomissioning Authority, describes the operational safety case for geological disposal of nuclear waste. It was submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 445
This e-mail from Alternatives North accompanies two reports from the UK Nuclear Decomissioning Authority.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 444
These are responses to information requests from a CEAA Panel regarding the Deep Geological Repository for nuclear waste in Ontario. See responses EIS-01-16 and EIS-01-17 (on pages 50-54) re: glaciation +shoreline change. Submittted by Alt. North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 443
This backgrounder from the Nuclear Waste Management Organization describes how future climate change and glaciation is considered in the long-term storage of nuclear waste. It was submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 442
This backgrounder on financial surety from the Nuclear Waste Management Organization describes a trust fund for managing nuclear waste disposal sites in Ontario. It was submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 441
This e-mail from Alternatives North accompanies three documents pertaining to the Deep Geological Repository for nuclear waste in Ontario.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 440
This is an AECOM report on the structural condition of the mill conveyor, submitted by the developer.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 439
This SENES report, submitted by the developer, describes the results of CALPUFF air quality dispersion modelling.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 438
This e-mail describes Alternatives North's expectations for the June 27-28 2012 workshop that the Giant Team will host.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 437
This is an agenda for a workshop that will be hosted by the Giant Team for EA parties. It will include an update on site work and progress since the technical sessions and IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 436
This e-mail from Alternatives North requests two report from the developer, one about the roaster complex and one about the main conveyor gallery. These relate to the site stabilization plan.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 435
This letter from Alternatives North is a reply to the developer's information request response regarding long-term funding.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 434
This document contains the developer's responses to the Review Board's three additional information requests regarding long term funding, Baker Creek and oversight.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 433
This is a letter from Alternatives North to the Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 432
This is an email from Kevin O'Reilly to Adrian Paradis on May 4 2012 regarding notification of upcoming information sessions for the Giant Mine Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 431
This is an email dated May 1 2012 from Kevin O'Reilly to Adrian Paradis regarding planned technical sessions for Giant MIne Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 430
This advises parties of a temporary change of contact until June 4, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 429
This file contains photos, tables and a spreadsheet provided by the developer on May 10th, 2012 at a meeting on the Site Stabilization Plan at the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 428
This is Chapter 3 of a report released by the Federal Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development titled "Federal Contaminated Sites and Their Impacts". It was submitted to the registry by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 427
This is a summary of a meeting about the Environmental Management System that occurred between the developer and parties on March 5, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 426
This is a summary of a meeting about the Environmental Management System that occurred between the developer and parties on March 5, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 425
This is the covering letter that accompanied the summary of a meeting about the Environmental Management System that occurred between the developer and parties on March 5, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 424
This is a plan for long term care fo the Hanford perpetual care site in the US. It has been submitted to the registry by Alternatives North as an example of a perpetual care plan.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 423
These additional Information Requests have been issued by the Review Baord to the developer and parties. Responses are due on June 11, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 422
This is correspondence from Alternatives North to the City of Yellowknife regarding approvals for the demolition of the mill conveyor at the Giant site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 421
This is a report by the Pembina Institute on report on Perpetual Care Funding Options for Giant Mine. It was prepared for and submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 420
This documentary deals with perpetual care issues in Europe. It was presented by Alternatives North at the Giant Mine Perpetual Care Workshop in Dettah.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 419
In this letter the Board extends the deadline for technical reports to July 11, 2012, as requested by the YKDFN. It also identifies other dates that have been adjusted to reflect this change.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 418
This is a discussion paper prepared for the Review Board by Alternatives North. It examines designation options for the Giant Mine.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 417
These attachments to the March 13 2012 letter from the developer were received on March 21 2012. They provide additional technical details about the mill conveyor work.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 416
This letter from the developer describes the legal basis for dismantling the mill conveyor. It is a response to the Review Board's letter of March 26, 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 415
This is a request from NSMA for extension of hearing notification for the Giant Mine Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 414
This letter provides Alternatives North's views on the YKDFN request for an extension.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 413
The following document is a report from a joint Alternatives North/Yellowkives Dene First Nation workshop on independent oversight for AANDC's Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 412
This letter from the YKDFN describes concerns regarding the mill conveyor work.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 411
This letter from the Review Board asks the Giant Team for the legal basis for the mill conveyor work and other any other site stabilization activties that are within the scope of the ongoing environmental assessment
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 410
This letter requests parties' comments regarding the YKDFN request to extend the technical report submission deadline to mid-July.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 409
This fact sheet and report, submitted by the YKDFN, describes BacTech technology for tailings remediation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 408
This letter from the YKDFN discusses BacTech tailings remediation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 407
This letter from the YKDFN requests a delay in the technical report deadline and hearing dates.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 406
This letter informs parties that the hearing will be no sooner than mid-May 2012, and that the deadline for parties' technical reports has been extended to April 16, 2012 for this reason.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 405
This letter describes Alternatives North's concerns regarding the March 13th, 2012 letter from AANDC about dismantling the mill conveyor.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 404
This letter states that the Giant Team is preparing to dismantle the mill conveyor by April 30, 2012 to address risks on site.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 403
This e-mail and its attachments highlight Alternatives North's concerns about AANDC's plans to apply for new land use permits and water licences before completion of the Environmental Assessment and without prior public consultation.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 402
This is a letter from Alternatives North highlighting concerns and requesting additional information regarding the responses received to the Round Two Information Requests.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 401
This Note to File describes the developer advising the Board that it will be ready for hearings no sooner than mid-May 2012.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Public hearings
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 400
This is a preliminary design report of the City of Yellowknife's new solid waste facility, submitted as technica session Undertaking #6.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 399
This is DFO's response to the second round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 398
This is an e-mail and Statement of Work for a study of long term funding options for Giant Mine. The study is being comissioned by Alternatives North and YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 397
This is an e-mail, proposal and agenda for a workshop on independence and oversight at Giant Mine, organized by Alternatives North and the YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 396
This is a report examining principles of perpetual care for Giant Mine, prepared for and submitted by Alternatives North.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 395
These are the developer's responses to the second round of information requests #1-28 from Alternatives North
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 394
This is the covering letter that accompanies the developer's responses to the second round of information requests.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 393
This is a letter from the Review Board to the City of Yellowknife regarding the municipal water pipeline and the scope of this EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 392
These are the developer's responses to the second round of information requests #1 and #2 from DFO.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 391
These are the developer's responses to the second round of information requests #1-7 from the Review Board
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 390
These are the developer's responses to the second round of information requests #1-5 from the YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 389
This is the response from Environment Canada to Alternatives North's IR #13 regarding air quality.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 388
This letter informs parties that the deadline for technical reports is March 16, 2012. It includes instructions for preparing technical reports.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 387
The following document is a letter to the Review Board from Dennis Kefalas, Director of Public Works and Engineering for the City of Yellowknife. The letter proposes a revised scope for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 386
The following document is a letter from the Review Board to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada regarding the Giant Remediation Team's submission date extension request.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 385
The following document is a letter from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada to the Review Board requesting an extension to the submission date for Information Request responses.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 384
The following document is an e-mail and attachment from Kevin O'Reilly regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Project and the realignment of Highway #4.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 383
The following document is a Note-to-File regarding a temporary alternate contact for the Giant Mine environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 382
This is Alternative North's second round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 381
YKDFN Round 2 IRs (90.64 KB)
This is theYKDFN's second round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 380
DFO Round 2 IRs (32.65 KB)
This is DFO's second round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 379
This is the Review Board's second round of information requests. They are directed to the developer and to DFO. The covering letter is posted as a seperate document.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 378
This is the Review Board's covering letter for the second round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 377
This letter reminds parties that the deadline for submitting their second round of information requests to the Giant team is November 30th, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 376
This is a revised workplan for the Giant EA, updated to reflect the current status of the environmental assessment as of November 2011.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 375
This is a cover letter for the undertakings from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 374
This document is Undertaking #12 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 373
This document is Undertaking #11 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 372
This document is Undertaking #10 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 371
This document is Undertaking #8 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 370
This document is Undertaking #7 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 369
This document is Undertaking #5 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 368
This document is Undertaking #3 and #9 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 367
This document is Undertaking #2 and #4 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 366
This document is part (c) of Undertaking #1 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 365
This document is part (b) of Undertaking #1 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 364
This document is part (a) of Undertaking #1 from the Giant Mine Technical Sessions held on October 17 to 21,2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 363
This is the report of the Giant Mine Perpetual Care Workshop held by Alternatives North in Dettah on September 26-27, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 362
This is the Material Safety Data Sheet for ammonia, provided to the YKDFN by the Giant team at the technical session on Oct. 18, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 361
This is the Material Safety Data Sheet for Dynalene HC, provided to the YKDFN by the Giant team at the technical session on Oct. 18, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 360
MSDS Fact Sheet- SUVA (277.83 KB)
This is the Material Safety Data Sheet for Dupont SUVA, provided to the YKDFN by the Giant team at the technical session on Oct. 18, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 359
This document describes volumes of waste at the roaster complex, and includes pictures. It has been submitted by the Giant team as part 2 of undertaking #7 from the techical sessions.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 358
This is a Feb. 2003 report titled "An Examination of Arsenic Contamination in the Roaster and Gas Handling Complex at the Giant Mill". It has been submitted by the Giant team as part of undertaking #7 from the techical sessions.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 357
This is the transcript of the October 21st 2011 technical session for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 356
This is the transcript of the October 19th 2011 technical session for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 355
This is the transcript of the October 19th 2011 technical session for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 354
This is the transcript of the October 18th 2011 technical session for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 353
This is the transcript of the October 17th 2011 technical session for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 352
The following document is AANDC's Long Term Monitoring Evaluation & Management presentation for Day 5 of the Review Board's technical sessions for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 351
The following document is AANDC's Risk Assessment presentation for Day 4 of the Review Board's technical sessions for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 350
The following document is AANDC's Baker Creek presentation for Day 2 of the Review Board's technical sessions for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 349
The following document is AANDC's FReeze and Undergound presentation for Day 1 of the Review Board's technical sessions for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 348
The following document is AANDC's Surface Remediation presentation for Day 3 of the Review Board's technical sessions for the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 347
This Note to File tells parties that the Oct. 17-21 technical session venue has changed to the Champagne Room in Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 346
This letter provides parties with an introduction to the upcoming techncial sessions for the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 345
This is the agenda for the technical session for the Gaint Mine EA, to be held at the Champagne Room in Yellowknife Oct. 17th to 21st, 2011
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 344
This clarification of the scope of the EA is a response to the YKDFN letter of Sept. 6, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 343
This is DFO's response to IR#19 by the YKDFN. [Note: This is being re-posted now because it did not appear on the web site earlier due to a technical error].
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 342
This is a covering letter for DFO's response to IR#19 by the YKDFN. [Note: This is being re-posted now because it did not appear on the web site earlier due to a technical error].
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 341
This is DFO's response to IR#26 by the YKDFN. [Note: This is being re-posted now because it did not appear on the web site earlier due to a technical error].
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 340
This is a letter from the YKDFN requesting a clarification of the scope of environmental assessment for the Giant Mine EA
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 339
This is a Note to File on a recent discussions with AANDC about techncial session planning. It includes an e-mail correspondence between parties.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 338
This is correspondence between Alternatives North and the developer describing issues regarding proposed work on tailings at Jo-Jo Lake.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 337
Reclamation Plan to permanently mitigate the historic tailings at Jo-Jo Lake in response to the May 2011 tailings spill (NT Spill 11-159)
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 336
Cover letter for the document regarding the reclamation plan to permanently mitigate the historic tailings at Jo-Jo Lake (NT Spill 11-159) .
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 335
This is a letter to up-date Review Board and parties of the assessment regarding the up-coming technical session for the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 334
This is a study titled "The Theory and Practice of Perpetual Care of Contaminated Sites" by Dr. Joan Kuyek, submitted by Alternatives North. The summary of this study is available on this web page in a seperate file.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 333
This is a covering letter from Alternatives North for a study of perpetual care of contaminated sites by Dr. Joan Kuyek. The study summary is included in the same file.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 332
This is a Note to File describing a meeting with the developer regarding new subsidence of the B1 pit wall and possible new activities on the Giant site.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 331
This is the Baker Creek Reach 7 Overflow Monitoring Program Final Report. It describes and characterizes the recent transport of tailings from the Giant Mine site into Yellowknife Bay via Baker Creek.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 330
For the convenience of parties, this document includes all the responses to the Review Board's information requests. (These are also available as several individual files on this website)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 329
For the convenience of parties, this document includes all the responses to the North Slave Metis Alliance's information requests. (These are also available as several individual files on this website)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 328
For the convenience of parties, this document includes all the responses to Environment Canada's information requests. (These are also available as several individual files on this website)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 327
For the convenience of parties, this document includes all the responses to the City of Yellowknife's information requests. (These are also available as several individual files on this website)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 326
For the convenience of parties, this document includes all the responses to Alternatives North's information requests. (These are also available as several individual files on this website)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 325
EC IR 14 Response (707.25 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 324
EC IR 08 Response (464.47 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 323
EC IR 03 Response (453.64 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 322
CityYK IR 13 Response (490.47 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 321
CityYK IR 11 Response (467.26 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 320
CityYK IR 06 Response (454.02 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 319
CityYK IR 04 Response (495.97 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 318
CityYK IR 03 Response (467.77 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 317
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 316
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 315
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 314
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 313
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 312
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 311
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 310
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 309
NSMA IR 20 Response (444.62 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 308
NSMA IR 18 Response (295.49 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 307
NSMA IR 15 Response (447.85 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 306
NSMA IR 14 Response (454.24 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 305
NSMA IR 11 Response (614.91 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 304
NSMA IR 04 Response (557.82 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 303
NSMA IR 03 Response (450.63 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 302
NSMA IR 02 Response (477.8 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 301
NSMA IR 01 Response (446.69 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the NSMA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 300
YKDFN IR 27 Response (465.77 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 299
YKDFN IR 23 Response (485.51 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 298
YKDFN IR 22 Response (486.49 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 297
YKDFN IR 16 Response (463.18 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 296
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 295
YKDFN IR 11 Response (386.03 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 294
YKDFN IR 10 Response (505.33 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 293
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 292
YKDFN IR 01 Response (479.27 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 291
RB IR 27 Response (482.4 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 290
RB IR 23 Response (475.32 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 289
RB IR 22 Response (543.32 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 288
RB IR 16 Response (567.44 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 287
RB IR 14 Response (475.08 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 286
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 285
RB IR 12 Response (466.28 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 284
RB IR 11 Response (491.92 KB)
This is one of INAC's / AANDC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests from the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 283
This is a covering letter for INAC's remaining responses to the first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 282
This is the Baker Creek Reach 7 Overflow Monitoring Program Interim Report. It describes and characterizes the recent transport of tailings from the Giant Mine site into Yellowknife Bay via Baker Creek.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 281
EC IR 17 Response (468.08 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 280
EC IR 16 Response (465.74 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 279
EC IR 15 Response (459.6 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 278
EC IR 13 Response (442.54 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 277
EC IR 12 Response (445.28 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 276
EC IR 11 Response (367.53 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 275
EC IR 10 Response (459.16 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 274
EC IR 09 Response (461.31 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 273
EC IR 07 Response (455.03 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 272
EC IR 06 Response (458.95 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 271
EC IR 05 Response (589.14 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 270
EC IR 04 Response (459.13 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 269
EC IR 02 Response (450.35 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 268
EC IR 01 Response (508.21 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Environment Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 267
NSMA IR 19 Response (458.96 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 266
NSMA IR 17 Response (442.67 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 265
NSMA IR 16 Response (452.63 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 264
NSMA IR 13 Response (738.28 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 263
NSMA IR 12 Response (368.55 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 262
NSMA IR 11 Response (614.91 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 261
NSMA IR 10 Response (309.26 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 260
NSMA IR 09 Response (385.17 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 259
NSMA IR 08 Response (458.58 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 258
NSMA IR 07 Response (468.11 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 257
NSMA IR 06 Response (446.08 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 256
NSMA IR 05 Response (449.11 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 255
YKDFN IR 26 Response (385.25 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 254
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 253
YKDFN IR 21 Response (462.98 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 252
YKDFN IR 20 Response (474.11 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 251
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 250
YKDFN IR 17 Response (468.14 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 249
YKDFN IR 15 Response (470.68 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 248
YKDFN IR 14 Response (467.51 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 247
YKDFN IR 13 Response (468.67 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 246
YKDFN IR 08 Response (500.17 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 245
YKDFN IR 07 Response (459.95 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 244
YKDFN IR 06 Response (473.15 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 243
YKDFN IR 05 Response (614.39 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 242
YKDFN IR 04 Response (385.57 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 241
YKDFN IR 03 Response (396.76 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 240
YKDFN IR 02 Response (471.84 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 239
CityYK IR 12 Response (456.83 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 238
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 237
CityYK IR 09 Response (467.91 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 236
CityYK IR 08 Response (464.57 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 235
CityYK IR 07 Response (388.31 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 234
CityYK IR 05 Response (469.21 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 233
CityYK IR 02 Response (495.62 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 232
CityYK IR 01 Response (465.17 KB)
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 231
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 230
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 229
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 228
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 227
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 226
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 225
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 224
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 223
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 222
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 221
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 220
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 219
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 218
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 217
This is INAC's response to the first round of information requests from Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 216
RB IR 26 Response (453.47 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 215
RB IR 25 Response (470.59 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 214
RB IR 24 Response (481.2 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 213
RB IR 21 Response (465.45 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 212
RB IR 20 Response (476.28 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 211
RB IR 19 Response (457.39 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 210
RB IR 18 Response (468.67 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 209
RB IR 17 Response (460.31 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 208
RB IR 15 Response (481.02 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 207
RB IR 13 Response (592.92 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 206
RB IR 10 Response (461.05 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 205
RB IR 09 Response (502.25 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 204
RB IR 08 Response (470.93 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 203
RB IR 07 Response (470.41 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 202
RB IR 06 Response (459.26 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 201
RB IR 05 Response (492.99 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 200
RB IR 04 Response (552.21 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 199
RB IR 03 Response (588.32 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 198
RB IR 02 Response (486.35 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 197
This is one of three graphics submitted as part of INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 196
This is one of three graphics submitted as part of INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 195
This is one of three graphics submitted as part of INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 194
RB IR 01 Response (467.34 KB)
This is INAC's response to the Review Board's first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 193
This is a covering letter for INAC's response to the first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 192
This is Environment Canada's response to YKDFN's IR#26 (Round 1).
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 191
This Note to File states that the Review Board has granted the 60 day extension requested by INAC for its responses to information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 190
This is a request from INAC for an extension for responses to the first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 189
This is a letter from DFO regarding information requests for the Giant Mine EA and the role of DFO with respect to the project. (Re-posted due to a technical error)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 188
This is a request from INAC for clarification of YKDFN's IR 10b, and the response from YKDFN.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 187
This is the Review Board' s response to an e-mail from INAC asking for clarification of IRs 3.6 and 7c. (Includes the original e-mail from INAC)
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 186
This is a report on independent environmental oversight prepared for the Giant EA. It was prepared independently by a team from the UBC Faculty of Law at the request of the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, the City of Yellowknife and Mr. Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 185
This is a covering letter to a UBC report on Independent Environmental Oversight.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 184
NSMA Round 1 IRs (136.15 KB)
This is the first round of information requests from the North Slave Metis Alliance to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 183
This is the first round of information requests from Environment Canada to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 182
This is the first round of information requests from the City of Yellowknife to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 181
This is the first round of information requests from Alternatives North to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 180
YKDFN Round 1 IRs (202.56 KB)
This is the first round of information requests from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 179
This is the Review Board's first round of information requests to INAC. It includes a covering letter stating that parties' IR submission deadline has been extended to Feb. 28, 2011at INAC's request .
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 178
This letter from INAC requests that the deadline for parties to submit the first round of information requests be extended from Feb.14th 2011 to Feb. 28th, 2011.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 177
This letter describes the allocation of participant funding for the Giant EA. It includes the decision of the review committee as an attachment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 176
This is a letter to parties from the Review Board regarding the Information Request deadline as well as the process change request for EA 0809-001. Information Request submissions are due February 14th, 2011. They are to be submitted as planned to INAC.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 175
This is an e-mail from Alternatives North regarding participant funding and information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 174
This e-mail from the North Slave Metis Alliance supports INAC's request to delay the IR submission deadline.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 173
This is a document titled "The policy framework in Canada for mine closure and management of long-term liabilities: A guidance document"". It was submitted by Alternatives North for use in its later submissions.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 172
This is a study titled "Lessons learned on community involvement in the remediation of orphaned and abandonded mine sites: Case studies and analysis". It was submitted by Alternatives North for use in its later submissions.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 171
This e-mail from Alternatives North supports INAC's request to delay the IR submission deadline.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 170
This e-mail from the YKDFN supports INAC's request to delay the IR submission deadline.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 169
This letter from INAC requests a delay in the information request deadline.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 168
This letter from INAC requests a change to the information request process described in the Revised Workplan of Dec. 23, 2010.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 167
This is a note to file stating that January 25th 2010 is the deadline for parties to submit information requests to the developer. This note includes guidance on the information request process and format.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 166
This is a revised workplan for the Giant EA, updated to reflect the actual Developer's Assessment Report submission date and timing considerations related to information requests. Updates to the information request process are included.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 165
This letter from INAC describes geotechnical investigations proposed for January 2011. These are related to the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Two letters are attached, one to GNWT Municipal and Community Affairs and another to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 164
Conformity Letter (438.1 KB)
This letter states that the Review Board has found that the Developer's Assessment Report is in conformity with the Terms of Reference.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 163
This letter from the Review Board informs Alternatives North that it has been granted party status.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 162
This is Tier 2 risk assessment, submitted as a supporting document attached to deficiency response item 1.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 161
This is the fourth of four deficiency response items, supplementing the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 160
This is the third of four deficiency response items, supplementing the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 159
This is the second of four deficiency response items, supplementing the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant EA.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 158
This is the first of four deficiency response items, supplementing the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant EA. A related supporting document is posted seperately on this site.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 157
This is the covering letter for the deficiency response. It supplements the Developers Assessment Report for the Giant EA. Four detailed items and an attachment are posted as separate files on this website.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 156
This is an application for party status in the Giant EA by Alternatives North.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 155
This is a MS Word version of INAC's participant funding guide and application form. It can be modified by applicants to include their particulars when applying for funding.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 154
This is a deficiency statement from the Review Board identifying items in the Terms of Reference that need to be addressed by INAC. [Note: Response deadline corrected to Dec. 15th, 2010]
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 153
This document is a guide to participant funding and application forms. It is an attachment to the Nov. 24th, 2010 letter from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada regarding participant funding for the Giant Mine environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 152
This public notice from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada announces participant funding for the Giant Mine environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 151
This is a letter from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada regarding participant funding for the Giant Mine environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Federal or responsible minister
Public Registry: 150
This is an e-mail responding to the Back Bay Community Association's request for information on the Giant environmental Assessment
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 149
This is an e-mail from the Back Bay Community Association regarding the Giant Remediation assessment process.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 148
This is number three of three documents submitted by INAC as the Government of Canada's review comments on the Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 147
This is number two of three documents submitted by INAC as the Government of Canada's review comments on the Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 146
This is one of three documents submitted by INAC as the Government of Canada's review comments on the Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 145
This is an e-mail from the YKDFN to INAC regarding the scheduling of the first round of information requests.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 144
This is a request from INAC to begin the first round of information requests in the new year.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 143
This is a note to file stating that the Developer's Assessment Report for the proposed Giant Mine Remediation Project was available on the Review Board's FTP site. The ftp site is no longer available.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 142
This is the covering letter that accompanied the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 141
This is a note to file about the distribution of the Developer's Assessment Report, the conformity check, and upcoming revisions of the workplan for the environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 140
Figures from the Giant Mine Remediation Developer's Assessment Report, EAA0809-001 posted at the request of Government of Canada.
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
Giant Mine Remediantion Developers Assessment Report Figures 5.2.1 to 5.11.3
Received:
Document Date:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
These are the figures from chapters 1 through 5 of the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Higher resolution versions were originally posted on the Review Board's FTP site, which is no longer available.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
These are the figures from chapters 7 through 14 of the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Higher resolution versions were originally posted on the Review Board's FTP site, which is no longer available.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
Giant DAR (4.04 MB)
This is the Developer's Assessment Report (DAR) for INAC's Giant Mine Remediation Project. Note that figures will be posted separately.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
These are the figures from chapter 6 of the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Higher resolution versions were originally posted on the Review Board's FTP site, which is no longer available.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
This is figure 6.13.1 from chapter 6 of the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant Mine Remediation Project. It is a Gantt chart showing the proposed implementation schedule.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 139
This e-mail from K. O'Reilly described participant funding provided by CEAA for the Gunnar Mine Site Rehabilitation Project in Saskatchewan.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 138
A letter was recieved by the Review Board from INAC regarding the Developers Assessment Rerport (DAR) submission for the Giant Mine Remediation EA0809-001, scheduled for the end of June 2010.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 137
This is correspondence from K. O'Reilly regarding participant funding for the Giant EA. It includes attachments providing an example from Nunavut.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 136
This is a letter from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation regarding meetings about the Giant remediation. It is a response to the INAC letter of March 29th, 2010.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 135
This letter from INAC states that the Developer's Assessment Report will be submitted by June 30th, 2010.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 134
This letter describes Indian and Northern Affairs Canada's workplan for activities at the Giant Mine site for the summer of 2010.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 133
This is a letter from INAC to the Yellowknives Dene First Nation announcing project information sessions in Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 132
This is a letter from INAC to the Yellowknives Dene First Nation requesting a meeting.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 131
This is a letter and proposal from the University fo Winnipeg and the Faculty of Law at UBC. It describes work that is being conducted (with outside funding) to examine different types of independent oversight agencies for consideration in the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 130
Until February 19th 2010, all contact regarding this environmental assessment should be directed to Nicole Spencer, Environmental Assessment Officer (Tel: (867) 766-7062; nspencer@reviewboard.ca ).
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 129
This is INAC's reply to the Dec. 8, 2009 letter from MLA Bob Bromley.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 128
This is the Yellowknives Dene First Nation's response to the request from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada for a meeting regarding concerns and consultation initatives.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 127
This is a request from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada for a meeting with the Yellowknives Dene First Nation regarding concerns and consultation initatives.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 126
This letter from INAC identifies April 2010 as the anticipated submission date for the Developer's Assessment Report for the Giant environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 125
This is a letter from MLA Bob Bromley to INAC Minister Chuck Strahl.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 124
This document contains an e-mail from Kevin O'Reilly (and attached letters from the Yellowknives Dene, City of Yellowknife and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada) regarding funding for independent oversight of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada's proposed remediation of the GIANT mine. This file is an addendum to the November 9th, 2009 letter from Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 123
This is an e-mail from K. O'Reilly with an attachment from the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board to INAC. Both pertain to authorizations for the current freeze optimization study being conducted at the Giant mine site. (Note that the activities currently occurring at at the Giant mine site are not included in the scope of the development for the environmental assessment)
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 122
This is a letter from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, the City of Yellowknife and K. O'Reilly to INAC regarding funding for participation in the current environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 121
This is an e-mail from K. O'Reilly regarding a discharge of arsenic dust that occurred during the current freeze optimization study. Attached is a departmental statement from INAC about the incident. (Note that the activities currently occurring at at the Giant mine site are not included in the scope of the development for the environmental assessment)
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 120
This e-mail pertains to current activities that are part of the freeze optimization study. Note that the activities currently occurring at at the Giant mine site are not included in the scope of the development for the environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 119
This letter outlines the progress made and steps being taken for INAC's freeze optimization study for the Giant Mine remediation.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 118
Workplan- Giant EA (150.6 KB)
This document is the Workplan for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 117
This document is the Terms of Reference for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 116
This is the covering letter for the Terms of Reference and Workplan documents for the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 115
These are the comments of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 114
These are the comments of the developer (INAC) on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 113
These are the comments of Kevin O'Reilly on the Draft Terms of Reference for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 112
CV of Oboni Riskope Associates expert that the Review Board has selected to assist it in the Giant Mine Remediation Plan EA.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 111
CV of Jerome Nriagu (155.41 KB)
CV of Dr. Jerome Nriagu, an expert that the Review Board has selected to assist it in the Giant Mine Remediation Plan EA.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 111
CVs of BGC Engineering Inc. experts that the Review Board has selected to assist it in the Giant Mine Remediation Plan EA.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 111
This notification advises the distribution list of expert advisors that have been retained by the Review Board, or that the Review Board intends to retain, for the provision of advisory services in the environmental assessment of the Giant Mine Remediatio
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 111
Draft Work Plan (183.83 KB)
Comments on this draft document are due on April 9, 2009. They can be submitted to Tawanis Testart by email or by fax at (867) 766-7074. The cover letter, with further instructions, for this document is attac
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 110
Comments on this draft document are due on April 9, 2009. They can be submitted to Tawanis Testart by email or by fax at (867) 766-7074.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 109
Letter from Indian and Northern Affairs to support and encourage the experts and the Board to raise any unresolved issues or questions for party comment if they arise in the future. INAC was referring to the fact that the experts were not in attendance at
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 108
This is a response to Indian and Northern Affairs letter of Jan 21, 2009 and clarifies the Reveiw Board's approach to hiring outside, independent expert advisors to assist the Review Board during EAs.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 107
Comments from Indian and Northern Affairs regarding the retention of experts in the Giant Mine Environmental Assessment. This is a letter clarifying INAC's concerns with the Review Board's recent Request for Proposals. A letter of concern was submitted by
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 106
This letter provides comments on the recent Reasons for Decision on Scope issued by the Review Board in the EA of the Giant Mine Remediation plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 105
The Review Board has made its determination on both the scope of development and scope of assessment in the Giant Mine Remediation EA. This document outlines this decision as it pertains to issues that were raised by participants during the scoping phase
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 104
Letter from Indian and Northern Affairs to the Review Board regarding posting additional material on the Public Registry, specifically for the Giant Mine Remediation EA.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 103
On november 20, 2008, Request for Proposals were issued for expert services regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 102
This letter outlines information requested by the Review Board on this matter. The Review Board is currently considering the scope of assessment for this EA and has not yet made an determination in this matter.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 101
This email exchange is in regards to a delay in posting certain registry items.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 100
INAC has expressed an interest in conducting a freeze optimization study, as described in Undertaking #1, submitted prior to the scoping hearing for Giant Mine. This correspondence includes a request from the Review Board for additional information o
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 98
Letter from the NWT Mining Heritage Society regarding heritage buildings and materials. This letter details various interests that the Mining Heritage Society holds at the Giant Mine site. This includes buildings, equipment and a potential transfer of l
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 97
Letter from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to MVEIRB highlighting 5 major DFO concerns regarding the scope of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 96
Mr. O'Reilly has provided comments on the responses received by the Review Board to undertakings that arose during the public scoping hearing for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 95
Submitted by Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 94
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 93
Sign in sheets from the second day of the Giant Mine Public Scoping Hearing, July 23, 2008
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 92
Sign-in sheet for first day of scoping hearing at Explorer Hotel. Includes media and public attendance sheet.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 92
Letter submitted by INAC that contains their response to Undertaking #4 from the scoping hearing for Giant Mine.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 91
A request from Warren Heath to the Board to send the Giant Mine Remediation Project to EIR.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 90
Response from MVEIRB to INAC's request for extension regarding the submission of undertaking #4.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 89
The Yellowknives Dene First Nation undertoke to provided their updated presentation to the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 88
Environment Canada clarifies their role in the EA process. Please note that this document incorrectly identifies this information as responding to Undertaking #8 and #9. It should read Undertaking #9.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 87
Undertaking explains INACs opinion on whether the interim activiites ongoing at the site contravene s.118, which states that no permit or authorization shall be granted while an EA is ongoing.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 86
INAC has requested an extension to August 22, 2008 to submit its response to Undertaking #4. The Review Board will consider this request at its next board meeting, August 19 & 20, 2008.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 85
INAC clarifies whether participant funding might be made available during an EA or an EIR.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 84
INAC proposes to complete a study of the proposed frozen ground method at a location on site. They agreed to provide more infomration on this proposed work to the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 83
Undertakings deal with property taxes, surface lease and water quality study results. This document is too large for the website. If interested in seeing the document please contact MVEIRB office.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 82
A submission by private citizen on behalf of his family who are YKD band members, regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 81
Medicinal Plant Study Report 2002-2003 ,from the Yellowknives Dene First Nations- Land and Environment Committee's. Submitted for the Giant MIne Remediation EA.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 80
In response to questions regarding the Ingraham Trail realignment, GNWT has submitted information about the status of that project.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 79
Report prepared for the Joint Review Panel in their review of the Mackenzie Gas Project. Submitted by Kevin O'Reilly as an attachment to his submission for the public scoping hearing held on July 22 & 23, 2008.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 78
Submitted by Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 77
Letter from Kevin O'Reilly, submitted after the scoping hearing held on july 22-23, 2008.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 76
Mr. Vaillancourt submitted this letter to the Review Board after the scoping hearing held on July 22 and 23, 2008. It details his concerns regarding the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 75
This letter deals with concerns related to training and education for northerners that includes a basic understanding of contaminated sites and the impacts of large-scale development.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 74
INAC Presentation at the Giant Mine Scoping Hearing at the Explorer Hotel July 22 and 23
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 73
Presented by the City of Yellowknife at the scoping hearing for the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 72
Presented by Kevin O'Reilly at the scoping hearing for the Giant Mine EA. Updated to include written submission also submitted to the Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 71
Presented by the Yellowknives Dene First Nation at the scoping hearing for the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 70
Presented on July 23, 2008 by the North Slave Metis Alliance during the scoping hearing for the Giant Mine EA.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 69
This is the transcript from the first day of the Giant Mine scoping hearing, conducted by the Review Board on July 22, 2008. This includes undertakings 1 through 5.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 68
This is the transcript from the second day of the Giant Mine scoping hearing, conducted by the Review Board on July 23, 2008. This includes a listing of undertakings 6 through 10.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 67
Several posters from INACs Contaminents and Remediation Division displayed at Giant Mine Scoping Hearing July 2008. Documents too large for website. Please contact MVEIRB office to see posters.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 66
Arsenic Levels in the Yellowknife Area: A report written by \r\r\nEnvironmental Science Group February 2001 for YASRC submitted as evidence by YKDFN introduced at the Giant Mine Scoping Hearing July 22 and 23, 2008 in Yellowknife,NT. It is marked as Exhibit 1.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 65
Letter from the City of Yellowknife Mayor Gordon Van Tighem regarding the main issues to be presented at the July 22 and 23 scoping hearing for the Giant Mine Remediation EA.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 64
Adopted council minutes from the March 18, 2008 Special Meeting of the City of Yellowknife to consider whether to refer the Giant Mine Remediation Project to environmetnal assessment. Includes resolution to refer the development to EA. Placed on the pu
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 63
Giant Mine Underground Arsenic Trioxide Management Alternatives. May 2003 Workshop Summary Report written for the Giant Mine Remediation Project.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 62
In this letter, the Review Board respectfully asks that representatives from Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans attend the scoping hearing for the Giant Mine Remediation environmental assessment on July 23, 2008 in order to provide the Review Boa
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 61
This is the proposed agenda for the upcoming scoping hearing for the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. The hearing is scheduled for July 22-23, 2008, Yellowknife.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 60
This is a letter reminding parties about dates and times for the upcoming public issues scoping hearing scheduled for July 22nd and 23rd 2008 in Yellowknife at the Explorer Hotel.

An agenda will be circulated later this week.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 59
A comprehensive list of 86 documents held at the Giant Mine Remediation Team's physical public registry in the Precambrian Building.Completed during the planning stages for the GMRP.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 58
This document lays out a preliminary scope of assessment, timelines and milestones for the environmental assessment of the proposed Giant Mine Remediation Plan.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 46
In this letter, the Review Board gives party status to an organization and an individual. Also, the Review Board issues the initial workplan for this assessment.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 45
A water quality study from 1985 that examines arsenic levels in Back Bay, near Yellowknife, NT. This study was requested by the North Slave Metis Alliance and provided to MVEIRB by the developer. The document is too large to put on the registry. Please contact MVEIRB if you wish to obtain a copy.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 44
This is the audio recording of the scoping meeting held at the Tree of Peace Friendship Centre on June 17 2008. This recording includes presentations from MVEIRB & the developer, along with questions. We were unable to upload the recording on the registry however if you are interested in listening to it please contact our office.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 43
This letter contains important deadlines for participation in the upcoming scoping hearing for Giant Mine. If parties intend to present during the hearing, they should inform Review Board staff before Jul 8, 2008.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 42
Review Board staff record of proceeding and compilation of comments from parties and members of the public made at the scoping session on June 17th, 2008, at the Tree of Peace Friendship Centre.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 41
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 40
On May 22, 2008, the Review Board and Review Board staff attended a site visit at the Giant Mine. The developer gave this presentation to the attendees.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 39
The developer gave this presentation to the attendees of a scoping meeting held on June 17th, 2008 at the Tree of Peace Friendship
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 38
Comments from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation-Land and Environment Department on the draft workplan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 37
This letter includes comments from the developer on the draft workplan.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 36
This email includes comments on the draft workplan from the North Slave Metis Alliance, including comments regarding participant funding.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 34
Comments on workplan (250.13 KB)
This letter from Kevin O'Reilly includes comments on the draft workplan, comments on participant funding and general comments on the Giant. It also includes an attachment referring to funding requests from a past project regarding public participation.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 33
Email from North Slave Metis Alliance requesting documents. Includes Environmental Assessment Officer's forward to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada requesting that the documents be provided to Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 32
These comments were submitted to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board during their preliminary screening of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. These comments were submitted to the public registry by Kevin O'Reilly.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 31
Submitted by the Contaminants & Remediation Directorate, INAC to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 30
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. This letter was submitted to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board during the review of CARD-INAC's proposed remediation plan. Feb 13, 2008
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 29
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. Canadian Institute of Resources Law and Cnaadian Arctic Resources Committee. Wenig, M. & O'Reilly, K., 21-January-2005
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 28
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 2002.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 27
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 26
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. City of Yellowknife, Revision 4- June 2006
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 23
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. Terriplan Consultants, March 30, 2007.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 22
This letter is an overview of concerns and issues Mr. O'Reilly would like to bring to the attention of the Review Board. The letter references several documents; all of which are included in the online public registry.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 21
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. The relevant sections pertaining to Mr. O'Reilly's submissions to the Review Board are found in Article 4 and deal with the establishment of an independent oversight body.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 20
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, January 2007.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 19
Attachment to Kevin O'Reilly's letter.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 18
A compilation of the preliminary screening comments received by the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board during the Water Licence application period for INAC's Giant Mine Remediation Plan. The comments have been organized chronologically and have be
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 17
A staff report prepared by the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board on the matter of INAC's water licence application for the Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 15
The Reasons for Decision prepared by the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board for INAC's water licence application for the Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 14
The Preliminary Screening Report conducted by the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board for the water licence application of INAC's Giant Mine Remediation Project
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 13
This letter invites participants to a scoping hearing on July 22 & 23 and a scoping session on June 17, 2008. Attached is an agenda for the June 17, 2008 session.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 12
Draft Workplan (143.5 KB)
This draft work plan & notification of party status is issued by the Review Board in the EA of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. The deadline for comments is June 18th, 2008. If you would like to submit comments on this work plan please contact Tawanis Tes
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 11
This letter asks from clarification of the letter of referral from the City of Yellowknife. The original letter states that the referral is made persuant to MVRMA s.126(2)(c); CARD-INAC correctly points out that the referral should be made persuant to MVR
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 9
Responding to the request for clarification from the Contaminants & Remediation Directorate.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 8
The attachment to the Request for Submissions letter is an outdated version of this form. This is the updated version. The old form differentiates between 'directly affected party' and 'intervenor'; the new one combines these choices as 'party'. By select
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 7
This letter is a request to participants in the Giant Mine EA for any relevant material they would like to add to the public registry for this EA. Any submissions should be sent to MVEIRB by fax at (867) 766-7074 or by email to ttestart@mveirb.nt.ca befor
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 7
This is the main document of INAC Contaminants Remediation Directorate's report which presents the work undertaken to evaluate in-situ and ex-situ alternatives for the remediation of the arsenic trioxide stored in stopes and chamber at Giant Mine. A numb
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 6
Attached is list of support document (appendices) to the main report of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan Due to the large volume and size of these documents, they have not been put on the MVEIRB website. Hard copies of these documents may be viewed b
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 5
This is the main overview of the Contaminants and Remediation Directorate's (INAC) plan to remediate the Giant Mine Site and contain the arsenic trioxide dust that is currently being stored there. This is a larger file. Please contact MVEIRB at (867)
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 4
Figures attached to the remediation plan. Please contact MVEIRB at (867) 766-7050 for a copy of this file.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 4
This letter notifies the developer of the referral to EA of the Giant Mine Remediation project. This development is being proposed by the Contaminants & Remediation Directorate, INAC.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 3
Notice of Referral (31.15 KB)
This letter notifies a distribution list of the referral to EA of the Giant Mine Remediation project. This development is being proposed by the Contaminants & Remediation Directorate, INAC.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 2
If you, as a member of the public, or your organization want to receive updates on this EA, please complete and return this form to Tawanis Testart at ttestart (at)mveirb.nt.ca or (86
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 2
This letter outlines the basis of the referral from the City of Yellowknife for the Giant Mine Remediation project.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 1