Information

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Keyword search
Clear filters

Results

Displaying 7176 - 7200 of 12191

Mineral Exploration at Howard's Pass (Selwyn Project) - EA0708-001 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Complete
Comments from INAC related to the draft workplan issued by the Review Board for the EA of Selwyn Resources proposed mineral exploration program at Howard's Pass.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Public Registry: 8
These comments were received by MVEIRB from the legal counsel for the Tulita District Land Corp., Rick Hardy. They are in response to the Draft Workplan issued by the Review Board for the EA of Selwyn Resources' proposed mineral exploration at Howard's Pa
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Public Registry: 14

Pine Point Pilot Project - EA0607-002 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Complete
Final comments by the Fort Resolution Metis Council in regards to the proposed Pine Point Pilot Project.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Public Registry: 245
Update from Review Board staff reminding Parties that the deadline for any comments on this file is November 6, and the Public Record will close November 7.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Public Registry: 244
Government of the Northwest Territories' responses to undertakings #4 and #5 (a and b) from the October 16th Public Hearing on the Pine Point Pilot Project.
Received:
Stage: Public hearings
Public Registry: 243
Tamerlane Ventures' response to IR#55, with a variety of clarifications on commitments made by the developer during the course of the Pine Point Pilot Project EA.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Public Registry: 242
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada's response to the Undertaking #1 from the October 16th Public Hearing on the Pine Point Pilot Project, identifying programs the federal government supports for traditional harvesters displaced by industrial activities.
Received:
Stage: Public hearings
Public Registry: 241
Environment Canada's response to Undertaking #3 on wildlife commitments made by Tamerlane Ventures, coming out of the October 16 Public Hearing on the PPPP. Indicates that wildlife concerns dealt with by Tamerlane's commitments.
Received:
Stage: Public hearings
Public Registry: 240

North Boomerang Lake Mineral Exploration - EA0708-003 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Withdrawn
A consolidation by the Review Board of the responses received to the Oct. 3, 2007 "Call for Comments" on how to structure the four uranium exploration EAs currently ongoing. Comments from 12 organizations and individuals received.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 22
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. Comments include preference for separate public hearings for each developer, evidence transfer from the Ur Energy public record and a Terms of Re
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 21
Comments include support for a resource development and conservation plan for the Thelon Basin as a prerequisite for further mineral development in the area and concerns regarding consultation and the lack of benefits for the Athabasca Denesuline.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 20
Response includes the support of evidence transfer from the UR Energy file and separate hearings for each developer, and separate Terms of Reference for each EA.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 19
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. The recommendations by Environment Canada include the transfer of evidence from the UR-Energy EA and developer specific public hearings.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 18

South Boomerang Lake Mineral Exploration - EA0708-002 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Withdrawn
A consolidation by the Review Board of the responses received to the Oct. 3, 2007 "Call for Comments" on how to structure the four uranium exploration EAs currently ongoing. Comments from 12 organizations and individuals received.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 22
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. Comments include preference for separate public hearings for each developer, evidence transfer from the Ur Energy public record and a Terms of Re
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 21
Comments include support for a resource development and conservation plan for the Thelon Basin as a prerequisite for further mineral development in the area and concerns regarding consultation and the lack of benefits for the Athabasca Denesuline.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 20
Response includes the support of evidence transfer from the UR Energy file and separate hearings for each developer, and separate Terms of Reference for each EA.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 19

Crab Lake Mineral Exploration - EA0708-005 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Withdrawn
Comments from Bayswater Uranium, expressing no opinion on how to structure EAs 0708-004 (E1 Lake) or 0708-005 (Crab Lake).
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 21
A consolidation by the Review Board of the responses received to the Oct. 3, 2007 "Call for Comments" on how to structure the four uranium exploration EAs currently ongoing. Comments from 12 organizations and individuals received.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 20
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. Comments include preference for separate public hearings for each developer, evidence transfer from the Ur Energy public record and a Terms of Re
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 19
Comments include support for a resource development and conservation plan for the Thelon Basin as a prerequisite for further mineral development in the area and concerns regarding consultation and the lack of benefits for the Athabasca Denesuline.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 18

EL Lake Mineral Exploration - EA0708-004 Go to Project

Environmental Assessment (EA) - Withdrawn
Comments from Bayswater Uranium, expressing no opinion on how to structure EAs 0708-004 (E1 Lake) or 0708-005 (Crab Lake).
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 21
A consolidation by the Review Board of the responses received to the Oct. 3, 2007 "Call for Comments" on how to structure the four uranium exploration EAs currently ongoing. Comments from 12 organizations and individuals received.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 20
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. Comments include preference for separate public hearings for each developer, evidence transfer from the Ur Energy public record and a Terms of Re
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 19
Comments include support for a resource development and conservation plan for the Thelon Basin as a prerequisite for further mineral development in the area and concerns regarding consultation and the lack of benefits for the Athabasca Denesuline.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Public Registry: 18