Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Chedabucto Mineral Exploration Project - EA1415-02

Scoping

Displaying 56 Document(s)
GNWT submission.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 90
This is the GoC's submission in response to the Review Board's ruling on the YKDFN's Request for Ruling. The GoC's submission concerns the YKDFN's first round IR#6.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 89
This document replaces the previous 2007 guide. This document is intended for information purposes only.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 86
The GNWT submitted this Guideline.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 84
This is a letter from the Review Board to the YKDFN regarding follow-up to the Review Boards ruling.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 83
An email from GNWT regarding DoT's approval for Husky to use the existing gravel pit and access trail.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 82
This is the Review Board's ruling on the matter of the YKDFN's request for ruling regarding IRs directed towards the Goverment of Canada
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 81
This is a letter from the Review Board to the GNWT and YKDFN regarding IRs and the scope of the EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 79
The GNWT submitted this guideline.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 77
This is a letter from EC in response to the Review Board's letter of Feb 19, 2015 regarding the Species at Risk Act.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 76
This is the Goverment of Canada's response to the YKDFN request for ruling.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 73
This is an email from YKDFN in response to the GNWT's may 25 submission regarding answers to the YKDFN's May 10 information requests.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 72
An email from the YKDFN regarding efforts to arrange a meeting with the Government of Canada.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 70
A letter from the Review Board to the GoC regarding the YKDFN request for ruling
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 69
A letter from the Review Board to the GNWT and YKDFN regarding GNWT's responses to the YKDFN's IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 68
This is a summary of the pre-hearing conference.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 67
This is the GNWT's response to YKDFN's first round of information requests. A seperate response will be provided for IR#4.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 64
The YKDFN have submitted a request for ruling.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 63
The GNWT and YKDFN held a meeting on May 12 to discuss YKDFN first round of IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 61
The Review Board has made its determination on the scope of the assessment. The Review Board's determination and reasons are set ou in the Scope of the Environmental Assessment Document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 51
This is the application form for Intervenor status. The note to file dated May 8, 2015 provides details about intervenor status and how to apply.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 50
This note to file serves as notice for the release of the Scope of the EA document, the second round of IRs, a call for intervenor status applications and hearing dates and locations.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 49
GNWT letter to the Akaitcho Screening Board regarding participation in the Chedabucto EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 48
The Tlicho Traditional Knowledge and Land Use Study for K'ichii, Whitebeach Point.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 47
This is the Government of Canada's response to YKDFN IRs #6 and #12.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 46
On March 31, 2015 Husky met with GNWT. The GNWT is submitting a revised set of meeting minutes that have been reviewed and approvoed by the Husky and replaces the existing minutes (PR#27)
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 45
This is the first round of IRs and Husky's responses. The GNWT's responses are PR#30 and #50. Canada's responses are PR#34 and #58.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 44
Comments from reviewers on the Proposed Scoping Document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 43
A ltter from the GNWT to the Review Board regarding several of the YKDFN IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 42
Husky requests an extension to April 30, 2015 to respond to Information Requests.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 41
This letter gives direction on to parties regarding IR extension requests and how to address any concerns a party may have with an IR.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 40
YKDFN IRs first round (212.79 KB)
The YKDFN's first round IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 39
the YKDFN's cover letter for first round of IRs and the Proposed Scoping document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 38
This Guideline was submitted by the GNWT.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 37
NSMA's letter submitted during the scoping phase.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 36
GNWT's cover letter for its comments on the Proposed Scoping document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 35
GNWT's cover letter for its first round of IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 34
Environment Canada's first round information request cover letter.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 33
A letter from the DKFN regarding first round information requests and comments on the Proposed Scoping document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 32
A letter from DFO regarding is participation in the Chedabucto EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 31
A map submitted by Husky during the first round of IRs.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 30
A letter from the Chamber of Mines in support of the Project.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 29
Meeting minutes for a meeting between Husky and the GNWT held on March 31, 2015.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 28
GNWT letters to Aboriginal groups regarding participation in the EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 27
Letters from the Government of Canada to Aboriginal groups regarding participation in the EA process.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 26
This is the presentation Husky gave at the March 31 meeting with the Review Board staff.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 25
Review Board staff and representatives of Husky held a meeting on March 31, 2015 to discuss the EA process and engagement efforts.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 24
The NWT chapter of the Council of the Canadians comments on the proposed Scoping Document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 23
This letter from the GNWT describes the participation and status of each departments role in the EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 22
Comments from Husky on the Proposed Scoping Document.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 21
This is the Review Board's Proposed Scoping Document. It outlines the proposed EA process and the proposed scope of developement and assessment. Please submit comments through the ORS.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 20
This is the Review Board's cover letter for the review of the Proposed Scoping Document and asking reviewers to submit information requests.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 19
This is Husky's response to the Review Board's information request of Feb 27, 2015.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 18
Review Board IR (156.08 KB)
This an information request from the Review Board to the Developer.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 17
The Review Board held a teleconference with Husky on Feb 26, 2015. This note to file is a summary of the meeting.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 16
This is a letter from a member of the public to the Review Board.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 15