Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Back to Project

Assessment/review startup

Displaying 25 Document(s)
Party Status Letter (35.79 KB)
This letter confirms that the Review Board has granted party status to the groups that requested it.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 47
Proposed agenda and details for a draft workplan information meeting / teleconference for EAs of Uravan Minerals Boomerang Lake South and North, and Bayswater Uranium El Lake and Crab Lake proposed mineral exploration programs.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 30
Project description summaries for both Uravan Boomerang Lake properties - South (EA0708-002) and North (EA0708-003).
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 27
A notice from the Review Board that Uravan Minerals Inc. has an extension available until January 18, 2008 to submit its Project Description Summary, if it so chooses.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 26
A request from the Review Board for the developer to provide a concise project description and overview of the existing environment around the Boomerang Lake South mineral exploration program, in advance of the issuance of a scoping questionnaire by the R
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 24
A resolution passed by the Fort Resolution Metis Council on November 14, 2007, opposing all uranium related activity in their traditional territory.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 23
A consolidation by the Review Board of the responses received to the Oct. 3, 2007 "Call for Comments" on how to structure the four uranium exploration EAs currently ongoing. Comments from 12 organizations and individuals received.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 22
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. Comments include preference for separate public hearings for each developer, evidence transfer from the Ur Energy public record and a Terms of Re
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 21
Comments include support for a resource development and conservation plan for the Thelon Basin as a prerequisite for further mineral development in the area and concerns regarding consultation and the lack of benefits for the Athabasca Denesuline.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 20
Response includes the support of evidence transfer from the UR Energy file and separate hearings for each developer, and separate Terms of Reference for each EA.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 19
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. The recommendations by Environment Canada include the transfer of evidence from the UR-Energy EA and developer specific public hearings.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 18
The response addresses the issue of how to most effectively run four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. One of the recommendations by the DKFN is to apply First Nations evidence gathered from the UR-Energy project to the four upcoming environmental
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 17
The response includes support for the transfer for UR Energy file information subject to party identification of relevant material, the deferment of an EA process until adequate progress occurs for a land and resource management plan in the Upper Thelon B
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 16
The response from the Government of the Northwest Territories to the MVEIRB's request for comments on how to most efficiently structure four separate EAs in the Upper Thelon area.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 15
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 14
The response is to MVEIRB's request for comments on the above topic to address the issue of simultaneously conducting four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 13
The response is to MVEIRB's request for comments on the above topic to address the issue of simultaneously conducting four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 12
This document dated October 24, 2007, provides the World Wildlife Fund's comments on how to structure the four ongoing Upper Thelon EAs. Provided late with Review Board staff apologies.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 11
The response is to MVEIRB's request for comments on the above topic to address the issue of simultaneously conducting four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 10
The response is to MVEIRB's request for comments on the above topic to address the issue of simultaneously conducting four separate EA's in the Upper Thelon Basin. From an expedition outfitter in the region.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 9
Document identifying different options for the conduct of the four EAs currently underway on projects in the Upper Thelon River basin. Deadline for comments is Nov. 2, 2007. PLEASE NOTE: INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD ONLY REPLY ONCE TO THIS REQUEST FOR
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 8
Notice of lead EAO (150.18 KB)
Notification from MVEIRB that Alistair MacDonald will be the lead EAO on each of the environmental assessments occuring around uranium exploration in the Akaitcho territory - EAs 0708-002 through 0708-005.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 7
Notification to the developer that their proposed Boomerang Lake Mineral Exploration project (amendment) has bee referred to EA by MVEIRB under its own motion.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 6
Letter notifies MVLWB that the Review Board has called up MV2007C0008 for environmental assessment under its own motion, according to s. 126 (3) of the MVRMA
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 5
Sent to an initial distribution list. The letter includes the request form to stay on the distribution list for this EA and a copy of the initial distribution list.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 2