Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Back to Project

All Documents

Displaying 123 Document(s)
NEB responds to Paramounts response to NEB Information Request No. 7.1, dated December 2001 in which the company provides an update on the status of consultations with First Nations and the Ft. Providence Metis Nation.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 123
Where NEB requests additional information in the attached Information Request.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 122
Request to hold decision until the traditional knowledge study is completed by Paramount and only until after Ka'a'Gee Tu have critiqued and identified gaps in the study.
Received:
Stage: Post Report materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 121
Explanation of why they forwarded correspondence between the first nations group and MVLWB
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 120
MVEIRB's Report of Environmental Assessment for the Cameron Hills Exploratory Drilling Project
Received:
Stage: Report of Environmental Assessment/Impact Review
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 119
The Review Board declined legal counsel's comments on Paramount's Responses to the K'a'Gee Tu's submissions on the Drilling Project.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 118
Where the first nations group remains concerned about the impacts of the development and considers Paramounts consultation efforts inadequate.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 117
Past correspondence between KTFN and the MVLWB of legal notification to MWLWB to provide sufficient notice of their position.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 116
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 115
Submitted by Golder Associates, this is a CD file please contact our offices for more information. This is a large file and is available from the MVEIRB office upon request
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 114
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 113
The Board requires Paramounts response to the August 21, 2001 Mandell Pinder Barristors and Solicitors (on behalf of K'a'aGee Tu First Nation) letter submitted to the Board.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 112
This document is in response to MVEIRB's previous request for clarification on DIAND's submitted technical submission. Several maps accompany this document that cannot be scanned. For further information please contact our offices.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 111
Received:
Stage: Technical or community sessions
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 110
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 109
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 108
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 107
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 106
on the Technical Review submitted by Paramount Resources on the Cameron Hills Drilling Project.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 105
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 104
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 103
Responded to IR's from Department of Education, Culture and Employment - GNWT, Mandell Pinder Barristers & Solicitors, and Environment Canada
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 102
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 101
in response to the MVEIRB issued request for IR's and Technical analysis comments .
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 100
Representing the Ka'a'Tu Gee First nation - provided information requests and notification of inadequate consultation efforts by Paramount.
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 99
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 98
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 97
By Golder Associates. This is a CD file, please contact our offices for more information.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 96
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 95
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 94
Received:
Stage: Developer's Assessment Report/Environmental Impact Statement
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 93
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 92
Received:
Stage: Information requests
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 91
Prepared by Golder Associates Ltd. The bound document is too large to scan, to view the document please contact our offices.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 90
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 89
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 88
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 87
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 86
The amendment request was approved subject to further consideration in the cumulative impacts section of the Cameron Hills EA.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 85
NEB has no concerns with Paramount's request
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 84
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 83
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 82
EC does not agree that inclusion of 10 possible future wells should be included in final terms since information is lacking.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 81
The removal of references to existing wells for the Cameron Hills project is valid since the wells are covered under existing Land Use Permits and therefore not required as part of the current LUP application.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 80
To add statement including the possibility of drilling in 10 future wells.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 79
Request for comments on proposed amendment.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 78
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 77
Specifically removal of the 4th bullet in Section 2 of the Draft Workplan and 2nd bullet in section 2.1 of the Draft TOR.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 76
Request to amend final version concerning references to requiring access to existing well sites.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 75
MVEIRB additionally requests that Paramount provide a letter to include in the final Workplan and TOR, 10 possible future wells.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 74
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 73
Final EA Workplan (1.91 MB)
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 72
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 71
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 70
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 69
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 68
Request for permit changes for removal in application of references to access and existing surface leases.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 67
Posed project questions and indication of no community consultation with Paramount.
Received:
Stage: Scoping
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 66
Comment that MVEIRB deadline of January 5th to receive comments is unreasonable given that most parties are away over the holidays, due to this their comments will be late.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 65
as expert advisors and not as a Responsible Minister
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 64
Re: wells that are applied for within an area but that do not have specific coordinates.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 63
Screenings pre-date CEAA.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 62
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 61
Also includes update that Paramount does not have a permit application before MVLWB for gathering facilities and a pipeline project.
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 60
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 59
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 58
Draft Work Plan (1.92 MB)
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 57
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 56
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 55
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 54
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 53
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 52
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 51
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 50
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 49
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 48
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 47
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 46
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 45
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 44
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 43
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 42
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 41
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 40
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 39
Sent out to inform all stakeholders of progress and present status on the project.
Received:
Stage: Other public registry materials
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 38
Requesting 1 year extension from January 14, 2001 permit expiry date.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 37
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 36
The Panel Meeting of November 9, 2000 raised concerns with Panel members - included are specific reasons for decision - and a decision was made to refer application to an EA
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 35
Sent out for comments to be used in the evaluation and Preliminary Screening of this application.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 34
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 33
Comprised of the following First Nation organizations: West Point First Natio, KatlOdeeche, Deh Gah Gotie Dene and Fort Providence Metis Council
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 32
Workplan (89.5 KB)
For Paramount Resources' natural gas exploratory drill program east of Fort Liard, Dehcho region.
Received:
Stage: Terms of Reference and workplans
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 31
MVLWB Staff Report (835.25 KB)
After review the MVLWB recommends that the operation will not have significant environmental impact and that a Land Use Permit and Water Licence be issued for 5 year period.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 30
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 29
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 28
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 27
K'atlodeeche would like the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board to refer the proposed application to environmental assessment.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 26
attached are INAC inspectors recommended land use operating conditions and narrative for the proposed project.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 25
The Dene Nation supports the communitiesƒ_T requests for and extension to the deadline for comments.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 24
Deh Gah Got'ie Dene Council and the Ft. Providence Resource Management Board would like to request a two week extension.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 23
Ka'A'Gee Tu First Nation's response to Paramount's application for a land use permit and water license.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 22
Ft. Providence Metis Council's comments and concerns regarding Paramountƒ_Ts water license and land use application application.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 21
The Katlodeeche would like to inform you that we will not be able to respond to the Paramount application before the deadline. The KFN request an extension.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 20
Stanton Regional Health Board's comments on Paramount's application of a land use permit and water license.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 19
DFO Comments on Paramount's WL and LUP Applications for the Cameron Hills
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 18
The Town of Hay River has no comments or concerns for the above mentioned applications.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 17
The West Point First Nation do not believe that they have been properly consulted regarding the proposed Cameron Hills project.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 16
For oil and gas exploration in Cameron Hills area, Northwest Territories.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 15
Fort Providence MActis Council would like to know why they havenƒ_Tt been added to the distribution list for the Cameron Hills LUP and WL application.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 14
Paramountƒ_Ts application for a land use permit and water license.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 13
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 12
Amendment granted in response to Paramount request for access to Wellsite B-25 as stated in letter of February 4, 2000.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 11
To authorize additional access request in later dated November 26, 1999.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 10
granted by INAC and permit covers the access road from the border to the well site only. From January 15, 1999 to January 14, 2001.
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 9
Received:
Stage: Assessment/review startup
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 8
Prepared by Arc Inc. Consultants
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 7
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 6
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 5
Received:
Stage: Preliminary screening
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 4
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 3
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 2
Prepared by Hardy BBT Ltd.
Received:
Stage: Technical reports
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 1