Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Drybones Bay mineral exploration - EA03-004

Other public registry materials

Displaying 110 Document(s)
YKDFN express their concerns with any activity in the Drybones Bay region and the possible loss/damage of heritage sites in the area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 180
NSV's completed archeological assessment of the Drybones/Wool Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 178
CBC New Article (226.78 KB)
MVEIRB approves Drybones drilling program.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 171
INAC's submission of supplementary materials promised at the public hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 167
MVEIRB's response to INAC's request for rulings.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 164
Resume of Marc G. Stevenson
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 163
Galbraith would like to know if the board hired an expert on the cultural significance of the Drybones/Wool Bay areas.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 162
Expert Credentials (515.83 KB)
Resume of Howard Dean Cluff
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 161
Resume of Allice Legat
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 160
Because EC has chosen to be an observer in the public hearings they did not present this information.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 158
The public registry will be closed for the duration of the public hearings.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 156
Submission from the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre regarding mechanisms for heritage resource protection.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 147
MVEIRB procedures for viewing YKDFN's reports.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 146
Clarification on information from NSV about the Mine Inspector's report.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 143
Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation has been accepted as a directly affected party. Attached is all the submissions received.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 142
MVEIRB approved Mr. Robertsonƒ_Ts request for directly affected party status.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 141
INAC would like MVEIRB to make a ruling, pursuant to section 44 of the Rules of Procedure, prior to the public hearing for the Drybones/Wool Bay assessments.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 140
Garner Lee's response to participant comments on regional cumulative effects study for Drybones/Wool Bay
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 139
YKDFN's comments and concerns with the submissions of NSMA, INAC, RWED and DFO.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 131
All participant comments on regional cumulative effects study.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 129
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Participation of Aboriginal parties and weighting of traditional use evidence.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 124
After reviewing all the CE study and subsequent comments the NSMA has a few remaining concerns they would like added to the public registry.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 121
NSV's comments, concerns and analysis of the cumulative effects study.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 120
DKFN's request for directly affected party status has been approved by the board.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 118
DFO letter requesting clarification on the discrepancies in the drill locations specified in the LUP application and the DAR.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 117
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Comments on cumulative effects study.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 116
INAC Trip Report (833.98 KB)
INAC's, Drybones/Wool Bay field trip report.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 115
Information provided by the NSMA has been removed from the Gartner Lee study for reasons of confidentiality and is not for distribution.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 114
MVEIRB provides NSV with advice on preparing for the public hearing.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 113
DKFN's identification of environmental assessment roles form.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 112
Compilation of all previous comments on the draft cumulative effects assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 111
Work Plan Amendments (963.11 KB)
The dates for the Pre-Hearing Conference and Public Hearing for NSV, CGV and NAGRC have been changed.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 110
MVEIRB advises the YKDFN of the steps they must follow in order to have documents be considered confidential. They also advise INAC and RWED of the request.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 109
Announcement (197.54 KB)
Work Plan amendments to NSV, CGV and NAGRC.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 108
NSV concerns with the EA process.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 107
YKDFN requesting that the information they have provided to the review board be closed to the public.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 106
MVEIRB addresses NSV concerns.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 105
DFO addresses NSV's concerns while reiterating the need for a full response to their September 17 letter.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 104
DFO critique of NVS and CGV's responses to fisheries IR.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 103
DFO believes that NSV has not provided the information requested in the IR. Therefor they are unable to make a decision.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 101
DFO Comments on the Draft Cumulative Effects Study
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 100
INAC comments on the draft cumulative effects study
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 99
Prince of Whales Northern Heritage Center comments on the draft cumulative effects study.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 98
YKDFN comments on the draft cumulative effects study
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 97
Draft CE Maps (993.42 KB)
Gartner Lee Ltd. submitted draft hand drawn maps.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 95
MVEIRB Fax Update (1.17 MB)
CGV, NAGRC and NSV Issues Summary for Environmental Assessments.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 94
Environmental guidelines for the construction, maintenance and closure of winter roads in the Northwest Territories.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 93
EA Process Update (111.1 KB)
MVEIRB updates all parties on the status of the Drybones/Wool Bay EA
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 92
NSV sends a second email to clarify what they meant in their sept 11 correspondence.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 91
DFO comments on the CE study for the Drybones/Wool Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 90
MVEIRB answers all NSV questions in their Sept 11 letter.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 89
NSV has questions about when the final draft of the study will be available. Weather his request to have the public hearing moved was going to be considered and weather or not he could attend the pre-hearing conference via conference call.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 88
Form to be completed by any group wishing to be given party status.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 87
MVEIRB corrects TerraFirma on the timing and scheduling of pre-hearing conferences , public hearing and the status of the EA process.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 86
MVEIRB Fax Update (1.17 MB)
Informing the distribution list of the stats of the environmental assessments of CGV, NAGRC and NSV.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 85
Comments are due by 5:00 on September 17.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 83
A draft of the above mention paper for discussion.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 82
Deadline Reminder (106.31 KB)
MVEIRB reminder for all parties that comments on the DAR's for developments in the Drybones/Wool Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 75
MVEIRB is writing with regards to the report on field studies in the Drybones/Wool Bay areas.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 74
MVEIRB update on the status on the EA for the Drybones/Wool Bay Area
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 67
YKDFN would like to inform INAC that they are concerned that MVEIRB is not fulfilling its mandate properly.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 66
YKDFN have issues with reasons and procedures used by MVEIRB when rejecting their referral to Environmental Assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 65
Informing Gartner Lee's visit to the site. Which allowed them to get a better idea for the scale of the development in relation to known traditional land use.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 64
NSMA would like to know more about the agenda for the site visit.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 63
Attached is the most recent draft of the CEAM Strategy and Framework and Regional Plan of Action for Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management for the Slave Geological Province.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 62
CPAWS will have observer status in this assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 61
MVEIRB response to all comments on the study of the Drybones and Wool Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 60
Final Terms of Reference and Workplan for the Cumulative Effects Study of the Drybones Bay/Wool Bay Area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 59
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Parties with standing for EA's in the Drybones and Wool Bay Area
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 58
ECE provides comments on the EA process for the Drybones EA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 56
MVEIRB was not informed of leases but did know about his cabin. MVEIRB has attempted to contact the man in question but received an auto reply say he would be away for some time.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 55
GNWT, NSMA, INAC and DFO's comments on the Cumulative Effects Study Terms of Reference.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 54
INAC would like to know if a lease holder was included in the EA process.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 53
MVEIRB thanks the NSMA for their comments on the draft terms of reference and workplan.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 52
YKDFN's complete Identification of EA roles form.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 51
Letters from YKDFN regarding Snowfeild's proposed exploration and cumulative effects in the Drybones Bay region.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 49
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Meeting with regulators Re: EA Process
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 48
MVEIRB appreciates the clarification on their plans and looks forward to working collaborating with the YKDFN on the cumulative effects study.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 47
GNWT identify their EA roles for NSV.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 42
This letter informs all parties that a cumulative effects assessment is be commissioned, contains REWD and NSMA comments as well as DFO and INAC's request for an extension.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 41
Note to File (164.76 KB)
YKDFN inquiry about developer's meeting
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 40
DFO writing to confirm the deadline for comments on draft terms of reference.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 38
This letter contains both their application and reasons to be considered for effected party status.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 37
Distribution of the Draft Terms of Reference and Schedule for the Cumulative Effects Assessment of the Drybones and Wool Bay Area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 36
MVEIRB declines DFO's request for an extension on the deadline for comments.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 35
MVEIRB rejects Eric Yaxley's request for an extension of the comment period.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 34
INAC and DFO's completed identification of EA roles form.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 33
Members of Environment Canada will be attending the above mentioned meeting.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 30
NWT and Nunavut Chamber of Mines identification of roles in NSV.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 29
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Rachel Crapeau and Louis Azzolini stopped in to discuss the Cumulative Effects Assessment, confirming that YKDFN do not want to prepare the CEA.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 28
MVEIRB has noted your request for an extension, we will get back to you shortly. MVEIRB will also forward parties information received since their last conversation.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 27
MVEIRB supplies DFO with materials regarding YKDFN concerns.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 26
INAC would like to request an extension on the comment period for the above mentioned project until after the meeting.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 25
Gavin More will be attending the above mentioned meeting.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 22
DFO will have difficulty meeting the deadline for comments on the three EA's in the Drybones/Wool Bay area. DFO therefor requests an Extension.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 21
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Phone call between MVEIRB and DFO regard the comment period for the Draft terms of reference and work plan.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 20
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Phone conversation with Louie Azzolini (on behalf of the YKDFN) about the cumulative effects assessment for the Wool and Drybones Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 19
MVEIRB has setup a meeting to discuss the EA process in their Board Room on Thursday July 3, 2003.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 18
MVEIRB asks Greg Robertson if they wish to be placed on the New Shoshoni distribution list.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 17
The review board has considered your letters concerning cumulative effects and has hired an independent consultant to conduct a cumulative effects assessment.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 15
Galbraith Empson advising MVEIRB that they will council for the YKDFN
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 14
Note to File (164.76 KB)
Summary of meeting with developer
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 13
INAC thanks MVEIRB for the copy of this letter as it allowed them to better understand the concerns of the YKDFN.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 12
When determining the scope of the assessment, the YKDFN request that MVEIRB considers the importance the Drybones and Wool Bay areas and the potential cumulative effects in the area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 11
MVEIRB would like to inform New Shoshoni of the possible cumulative effects in the area due to 2 other proposed developments in the area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 10
When determining the scope of the assessment, the YKDFN request that MVEIRB considers the importance the Drybones and Wool Bay areas and the potential cumulative effects in the area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 9
Requests of interested parties to remain on the distribution list.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 8
Address Correction (75.99 KB)
New Shoshoni gives MVEIRB its correct adress.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 6
Great Slave Cruising Club asking to be placed on the public record
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 5
Article in the Weledeh Gondi regarding developments in the Drybones/Wool Bay area.
Received:
Document Date:
Originator: Other
Public Registry: 1