Notice

Welcome to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board's New Website!

We are delighted to introduce you to our revamped website, designed to provide an improved and seamless experience.

What's New:

  • Modernized Interface: Enjoy a fresh, intuitive design that makes navigation effortless.
  • New Public Registry Features: Explore our new public registry for the latest information.
  • Personalized Subscriptions: Subscribe to specific projects, news releases, and preliminary screening updates.
  • Improved Performance: Experience faster load times and optimized browsing across all devices.
  • Enhanced Security: Your data is protected with our upgraded security measures.

How to Access the New Public Registry:

To access the public registry, click the button below:

Public Registry

  • Explore Listings: Browse through the registry for detailed information on our projects.
  • Explore Categories: Browse by project, document listing or timeline.
  • Search Functionality: Use the search bar and advanced filters to find specific entries quickly.

How to Subscribe to Projects and Screenings:

  • Subscribe:
    • Use the subscribe button to add your email and receive notification about new documents for a project.
    • Choose to subscribe or unsubscribe from a specific project.
    • Existing subscribers from the Online Review System can also log in to the site to manage subscriptions.
  • Online Review System Dashboard:
    • Login using the Login with MVRB ORS button at bottom left of the home page.
    • Go to my account.
    • Manage and view subscriptions and comments.

Download this mini website guide for a visual step by step walk through

Thank You for Your Visit and Interest in Our Work!

Your feedback helps us improve. Please take a moment to share your thoughts through our . We appreciate your interest and support.

Back to Project

Terms of Reference and workplans

Displaying 76 Document(s)
Sent to the distribution list.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 595
Request from CARC to re-name the "pre-hearing conference".
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 594
Comments from De Beers regarding INAC's Request for Ruling.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 578
Letter regards the deadline for submission of the final round of Information Requests.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 577
Cover letters which accompanied the hardcopy mailout.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 575
Comments and a proposal regarding the workplan schedule.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 574
Comments from De Beers regarding proposed amendments to the workplan.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 573
Response to email dated July 16, 2002.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 560
Response to fax from Chamberlain Hutchison regarding the dates for the next full Board meeting.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 558
Fax requesting date that the Review Board will meet to determine work plan amendments.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 556
Response to MVEIRB re: revised work plan and request for confirmation of an opportunity to submit additional IR's arising from IR responses (round one & two).
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 555
Request for Ruling on changing the EA process as outlined in the workplan so that the technical sessions precede the preperation and submission of the technical reports.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 553
Distribution of the letter dated July 10, 2002.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 546
Letters regards the amendments to the Workplan and the extended timeline.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 545
Comments regarding the proposed amendments to the DeBeers Snap Lake Workplan. Request for an extended deadline for the Information Request round two.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 538
Fax coversheet.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 537
Distribution of additional comments received on the proposed workplan, and recent communication from Chamberlain Hutchison Barristers and Solicitors.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 536
Comments regarding the amendments to the De Beers Workplan and more.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 534
Comments regarding Workplan for the De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 533
Comments regarding the proposed timeline for the environmental assessment of De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 532
Comments regarding amendments to the De Beers Workplan.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 531
Comments regarding the amended Workplan for the De Beers Snap Lake Diamond Project environmental assessment.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 530
Email notifying that NRCan will be unable to attend the meeting.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 528
Request for Meeting (21.13 KB)
Meeting to discuss the De Beers Work Plan Amendments.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 524
Proposed Workplan amendments and request for comments.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 522
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 520
Letter regards amendments to the workplan.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 518
Comments regarding amendments to the Workplan.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 517
Comments regarding amendments to the Workplan.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 516
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 428
Email distribution of the De Beers Terms of Reference expert reviewers.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 122
Email regards the Terms of Reference lines that Environment Canada can comment on.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 114
Email provides comments from NRCan on the ToR.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 103
Email correspondence between Canadian Artic Resources Committee and MVEIRB.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 95
Response to LKDFN's request for a public scoping session on the DToR made in their submission of comments on the DToR.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 94
MVEIRB's rulings on the Rules of Procedure and the request for a public scoping meeting on the DToR.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 93
Sent out by MVEIRB to the distribution list.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 92
Distributed via fax and email.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 90
MVEIRB's ruling on the Request for Ruling submitted by CARC on July 30, 2001 for a provision for intervener funding to non-Aboriginal organizations for the De Beers Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 88
Comments from the developer on the submissions made by Candian Arctic Resources Canada dated August 23 and 24, 2001.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 87
De Beers reply to the submission by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada dated August 24, 2001.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 86
Developer's reponse to the submission made by Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation on the Draft Terms of Reference and Workplan.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 85
Email by MVEIRB.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 84
Response from INAC to the MVEIRB request to provide its legal, policy or practicality considerations in support of its assertion that use of the rules is inappropiate.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 83
Comments from LKDFN on the DToR for the Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 82
Response to request from MVEIRB to provide facts and rational for the Request for Ruling for a public hearing on the Draft Terms of Reference.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 79
Response from CARC to the request from MVEIRB to provide rationale and facts for their Request for Ruling for a public hearing re: the Draft Terms of Reference.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 78
Sent out by MVEIRB to the distribution list. MVEIRB's response to their submissions is also attached.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 76
MVEIRB's reponse to submissions from CARC and INAC in response to the Review Board's Requests for Information. Additional requests were made by the Review Board.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 75
Copies of the letters submitted by De Beers regarding concerns over procedural fairness in the Request for Ruling on a public hearing for the DToR sent out by MVEIRB to the distribution list.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 74
A copy of the letter from De Beers expressing concern over procedural fairness was emailed out by MVEIRB to the distribution list.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 73
Correction to the draft meeting notes submitted by Natural Resources Canada (for the meeting regarding the DToR which took place on July 27, 2001).
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 72
Letters regard concerns over procedural fairness (a copy of the first letter was out to the distribution list via fax and email).
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 71
Comments from the MVLWB sent to MVEIRB by email.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 70
Email distribution of the Review Board's decisions in response to the Request for Ruling for a public hearing on the DToR and Request for Ruling on a deadline extension for the submission of comments on the DToR.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 69
Comments from WWF on the DToR for the environmental assessment of De Beers Canada Mining Inc. Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 68
MVEIRB response to the Request for Ruling submitted by both the Lutsel K'e First Nation and the Canadian Arctic Resources Commitee on a deadline extension for the submission of comments on the DToR.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 67
Via fax and email.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 65
Request from Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation for additional time to provide comments on the DToR.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 62
Notes from the meeting which took place on July 27, 2001 and regards the Draft Terms of Reference for the Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 61
Comments from De Beers on the DToR for the Snap Lake Project.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 60
Comments submitted by DFO on the DToR for the EA of De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 59
Comments from the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, GNWT on the DToR for the De Beers Snap Lake Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 58
Comments from NRCan on the DToR for the EA of De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 57
Comments from EC on the DToR for the environmental assessment of De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 56
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada's comments on the DToR for the De Beers Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 55
Comments from the Yellowknives Dene First Nation on the DToR for De Beers Canada Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 54
Email requesting MVEIRB to make additions to the meeting list of attendees.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 53
Distributed via fax.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 52
Canadian Arctic Resources Committee's preliminary comments on the DToR and request for rulings on various aspects of the De Beers Snap Lake Project. MVEIRB response is also attached.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 51
Meeting Notes (2.94 MB)
Meeting regards aspects of the De Beers Snap Lake Project.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 50
Correspondence regarding delaying the July 27th meeting which was scheduled to discuss the Draft Terms of Reference.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 49
Response from MVEIRB also included.
Received:
Originator: Parties/Public
Public Registry: 39
Notice of meeting to discuss the Draft Terms of Reference and Workplan scheduled for July 20 & 27, 2001.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 32
Sent out by MVEIRB via fax.
Received:
Originator: Review Board
Public Registry: 24
Submitted by De Beers for the environmental assessment of the Snap Lake Diamond Project.
Received:
Originator: Developer
Public Registry: 22